Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1006

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1006_Adipocyte_Olfactory_Preadipocyte_tenocyte_Hair_meningioma_Osteoblast



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr11:86518734..86518759,+ p5@PRSS23
Hg19::chr11:86518976..86519000,+ p4@PRSS23
Hg19::chr11:86519101..86519122,+ p7@PRSS23
Hg19::chr11:86519290..86519308,+ p@chr11:86519290..86519308
+
Hg19::chr11:86519351..86519363,+ p@chr11:86519351..86519363
+
Hg19::chr11:86519387..86519399,+ p@chr11:86519387..86519399
+
Hg19::chr11:86519501..86519515,+ p@chr11:86519501..86519515
+
Hg19::chr11:86519826..86519851,+ p@chr11:86519826..86519851
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset
data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset
data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset

cell_data
uberon_data


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
mesodermal cell3.71e-16121
embryonic cell9.78e-13250
fibroblast2.25e-1176
animal cell1.05e-10679
eukaryotic cell1.05e-10679
lining cell1.38e-1058
barrier cell1.38e-1058
epithelial cell2.82e-10253
smooth muscle cell1.15e-0743
smooth muscle myoblast1.15e-0743
endothelial cell of vascular tree1.39e-0724
muscle precursor cell3.24e-0758
myoblast3.24e-0758
multi-potent skeletal muscle stem cell3.24e-0758
vascular associated smooth muscle cell7.61e-0732
stromal cell9.61e-0728
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
vasculature3.19e-1578
vascular system3.19e-1578
artery4.97e-1242
arterial blood vessel4.97e-1242
arterial system4.97e-1242
vessel6.88e-1268
epithelial tube open at both ends3.10e-1159
blood vessel3.10e-1159
blood vasculature3.10e-1159
vascular cord3.10e-1159
cardiovascular system9.69e-11109
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.29e-1083
circulatory system3.96e-10112
epithelial tube1.09e-09117
systemic artery3.66e-0933
systemic arterial system3.66e-0933
unilaminar epithelium1.86e-08148
organism subdivision4.03e-08264
trunk3.54e-07199
anatomical cluster6.37e-07373


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs
data

Jaspar motifs
data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.0264723
MA0004.10.455723
MA0006.10.300178
MA0007.11.1148
MA0009.10.918715
MA0014.10.00962431
MA0017.10.337901
MA0019.10.602411
MA0024.10.813542
MA0025.11.05265
MA0027.12.5321
MA0028.10.315574
MA0029.10.832916
MA0030.10.821423
MA0031.10.756713
MA0038.10.557409
MA0040.10.838784
MA0041.10.474018
MA0042.10.442535
MA0043.10.919032
MA0046.10.90778
MA0048.11.60389
MA0050.10.443405
MA0051.10.553205
MA0052.10.842664
MA0055.10.118169
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.0912556
MA0058.10.362328
MA0059.10.361075
MA0060.10.190336
MA0061.10.165998
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.557833
MA0067.11.23721
MA0068.10.133123
MA0069.10.903908
MA0070.10.892666
MA0071.10.518907
MA0072.10.888148
MA0073.19.20286e-05
MA0074.10.552456
MA0076.10.377799
MA0077.10.880402
MA0078.10.652193
MA0081.10.361233
MA0083.10.926258
MA0084.11.42483
MA0087.10.885691
MA0088.10.054222
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.391903
MA0091.10.458301
MA0092.11.07975
MA0093.10.303084
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.571227
MA0101.10.30624
MA0103.10.291333
MA0105.10.0818021
MA0106.12.48303
MA0107.10.666147
MA0108.20.753643
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.405141
MA0113.10.614917
MA0114.10.231781
MA0115.11.1606
MA0116.11.25157
MA0117.10.956472
MA0119.10.345493
MA0122.10.982472
MA0124.11.11898
MA0125.11.0347
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.670358
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.10.949204
MA0136.10.564434
MA0139.10.155155
MA0140.10.516266
MA0141.11.68422
MA0142.10.724856
MA0143.10.615094
MA0144.10.623945
MA0145.10.0613434
MA0146.10.00761723
MA0147.10.243042
MA0148.10.480298
MA0149.10.506665
MA0062.20.161302
MA0035.20.515566
MA0039.20.00915579
MA0138.20.653421
MA0002.20.179788
MA0137.20.321796
MA0104.20.189646
MA0047.20.586412
MA0112.20.0572179
MA0065.20.0631316
MA0150.10.386144
MA0151.10
MA0152.11.29801
MA0153.11.01778
MA0154.10.0799828
MA0155.11.16939
MA0156.11.55957
MA0157.10.697424
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.243637
MA0160.10.495355
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.0163939
MA0163.10.0104024
MA0164.10.627336
MA0080.21.48508
MA0018.21.46097
MA0099.20.523145
MA0079.21.41562e-07
MA0102.21.46209
MA0258.10.209744
MA0259.10.25092
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.
Analyst:NA

link to data source
data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.