Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1284

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1284_mucinous_ductal_small_endometrial_adrenal_extraskeletal_large



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr7:83824097..83824114,- p1@SEMA3A
Hg19::chr7:83824169..83824176,- p6@SEMA3A
Hg19::chr7:83824279..83824295,- p7@SEMA3A
Hg19::chr7:83824296..83824315,- p2@SEMA3A
Hg19::chr7:83824392..83824434,- p3@SEMA3A
Hg19::chr7:83824449..83824496,- p4@SEMA3A
Hg19::chr7:83824512..83824536,- p10@SEMA3A


Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset
data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset
data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset

cell_data
uberon_data


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
fibroblast1.23e-0876
electrically responsive cell2.68e-0761
electrically active cell2.68e-0761
non-terminally differentiated cell3.48e-07106
skin fibroblast3.72e-0723
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
anatomical cluster7.10e-20373
anatomical system4.09e-18624
anatomical group6.06e-18625
multi-tissue structure5.80e-17342
multi-cellular organism1.52e-16656
organ system subdivision7.62e-13223
organ9.36e-12503
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest3.50e-11132
embryo1.79e-10592
ectoderm-derived structure2.76e-10171
ectoderm2.76e-10171
presumptive ectoderm2.76e-10171
cell layer1.37e-09309
epithelium2.05e-09306
organism subdivision1.12e-08264
surface structure1.34e-0899
organ part1.35e-08218
central nervous system1.97e-0881
developing anatomical structure2.27e-08581
embryonic structure2.58e-08564
intestine2.79e-0817
anatomical conduit3.98e-08240
nervous system4.24e-0889
germ layer4.58e-08560
germ layer / neural crest4.58e-08560
embryonic tissue4.58e-08560
presumptive structure4.58e-08560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure4.58e-08560
epiblast (generic)4.58e-08560
digestive system2.09e-07145
digestive tract2.09e-07145
primitive gut2.09e-07145
gastrointestinal system2.19e-0725
neurectoderm3.10e-0786


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs
data

Jaspar motifs
data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.358813
MA0004.10.502801
MA0006.10.341337
MA0007.10.483857
MA0009.10.973289
MA0014.10.0156227
MA0017.10.380797
MA0019.10.652951
MA0024.10.867125
MA0025.11.10816
MA0027.12.59001
MA0028.10.35747
MA0029.10.886702
MA0030.10.875089
MA0031.10.809638
MA0038.10.60704
MA0040.10.892629
MA0041.10.521615
MA0042.10.48922
MA0043.10.973609
MA0046.10.962263
MA0048.10.120314
MA0050.11.22833
MA0051.11.46692
MA0052.10.896548
MA0055.10.0407081
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.115382
MA0058.10.406232
MA0059.10.404929
MA0060.10.224688
MA0061.10.198335
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.607474
MA0067.11.29359
MA0068.10.162298
MA0069.10.958358
MA0070.10.947018
MA0071.10.567661
MA0072.10.942461
MA0073.10.065183
MA0074.10.60198
MA0076.10.422297
MA0077.10.934645
MA0078.12.81941
MA0081.10.405093
MA0083.10.980893
MA0084.11.48179
MA0087.10.939982
MA0088.10.0723293
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.436918
MA0091.10.505453
MA0092.10.467172
MA0093.10.344385
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.621149
MA0101.10.347695
MA0103.10.332048
MA0105.10.104569
MA0106.10.648997
MA0107.10.274127
MA0108.20.806528
MA0109.10
MA0111.11.14351
MA0113.10.665691
MA0114.10.269076
MA0115.11.21667
MA0116.10.277571
MA0117.11.01134
MA0119.10.388712
MA0122.11.03753
MA0124.11.17486
MA0125.11.0901
MA0130.10
MA0131.12.87791
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.00402
MA0136.10.614215
MA0139.10.186511
MA0140.10.564957
MA0141.10.403171
MA0142.10.777365
MA0143.11.59899
MA0144.10.254954
MA0145.10.0807715
MA0146.10.0127148
MA0147.10.281049
MA0148.10.528066
MA0149.10.555119
MA0062.20.193221
MA0035.20.564239
MA0039.20.00276064
MA0138.20.704862
MA0002.20.611548
MA0137.20.36398
MA0104.20.223944
MA0047.20.636643
MA0112.20.0758925
MA0065.20.0828768
MA0150.10.430951
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.571637
MA0153.11.07307
MA0154.10.335384
MA0155.10.071478
MA0156.10.36627
MA0157.10.749547
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.281681
MA0160.10.543522
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.0249953
MA0163.10.0167306
MA0164.10.678332
MA0080.20.344472
MA0018.20.650405
MA0099.20.572
MA0079.20.0015479
MA0102.21.51913
MA0258.10.245543
MA0259.10.289405
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066475.360256373075037.86114662284756e-060.000222556327498936
EP300#203376.77394172622321.52695018318475e-065.86945712851058e-05
JUND#372776.994663941871031.21993360047445e-064.9287677098627e-05
POLR2A#543072.147453176558070.004747636447610280.0223602436505962
SIN3A#2594275.408884726815147.3795239773719e-060.000211733545239765
TAF1#687273.343046285745290.0002142336319622450.00246875717626668
TCF7L2#6934710.77017656313735.9423478161588e-083.69852719649469e-06
TRIM28#10155718.59052504526251.300439693691e-091.17488426617123e-07
ZZZ3#260097239.4132124352332.15856704034244e-174.51780727708064e-15



Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.
Analyst:NA

link to data source
data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.