Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1532

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1532_CD14_serous_clear_pharyngeal_epidermoid_large_glassy



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr6:126240356..126240379,+ p7@NCOA7
Hg19::chr6:126240380..126240430,+ p2@NCOA7
Hg19::chr6:126240442..126240459,+ p4@NCOA7
Hg19::chr6:126240463..126240489,+ p6@NCOA7
Hg19::chr6:126240490..126240501,+ p11@NCOA7
Hg19::chr6:126240542..126240553,+ p14@NCOA7


Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset
data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset
data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset

cell_data
uberon_data
disease_data


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
classical monocyte1.02e-0842
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.02e-0842
defensive cell6.39e-0748
phagocyte6.39e-0748
endodermal cell8.94e-0758
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
endoderm-derived structure9.02e-13160
endoderm9.02e-13160
presumptive endoderm9.02e-13160
digestive system1.40e-12145
digestive tract1.40e-12145
primitive gut1.40e-12145
subdivision of digestive tract5.67e-12118
foregut3.80e-0987
larynx3.15e-079
respiratory system6.25e-0774
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
carcinoma8.61e-11106


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs
data

Jaspar motifs
data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.00461978
MA0004.10.558729
MA0006.10.391183
MA0007.10.539222
MA0009.11.03681
MA0014.10.0254709
MA0017.11.935
MA0019.10.7124
MA0024.10.929647
MA0025.11.17262
MA0027.12.65688
MA0028.10.408079
MA0029.10.949428
MA0030.10.937696
MA0031.10.871496
MA0038.10.665566
MA0040.10.955415
MA0041.10.578072
MA0042.10.544748
MA0043.11.03713
MA0046.11.02569
MA0048.10.152639
MA0050.10.545671
MA0051.13.90068
MA0052.10.959373
MA0055.10.0586456
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.147053
MA0058.10.458909
MA0059.10.457555
MA0060.10.267412
MA0061.10.23892
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.66601
MA0067.11.35893
MA0068.10.199491
MA0069.15.4158
MA0070.11.01032
MA0071.10.625297
MA0072.11.00572
MA0073.10.00076337
MA0074.10.660398
MA0076.10.475586
MA0077.15.31709
MA0078.11.80244
MA0081.10.457725
MA0083.11.04447
MA0084.11.5477
MA0087.11.00322
MA0088.10.32124
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.490736
MA0091.10.561458
MA0092.12.2336
MA0093.10.394379
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.679972
MA0101.10.397846
MA0103.10.381434
MA0105.10.830067
MA0106.10.70837
MA0107.10.320267
MA0108.20.868347
MA0109.10
MA0111.12.17722
MA0113.10.725375
MA0114.10.845337
MA0115.11.28169
MA0116.10.323925
MA0117.11.07516
MA0119.10.440684
MA0122.11.10154
MA0124.11.23968
MA0125.11.15445
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.782708
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.06778
MA0136.11.61362
MA0139.10.226048
MA0140.10.622527
MA0141.10.455728
MA0142.10.838805
MA0143.10.725558
MA0144.12.24895
MA0145.10.107156
MA0146.10.0213085
MA0147.10.327615
MA0148.18.88885
MA0149.10.612449
MA0062.20.23336
MA0035.20.621793
MA0039.20.0929059
MA0138.20.765223
MA0002.20.255126
MA0137.20.414885
MA0104.20.26661
MA0047.20.695777
MA0112.20.101413
MA0065.20.109623
MA0150.10.484557
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.629368
MA0153.11.13732
MA0154.10.132326
MA0155.10.0961854
MA0156.12.81343
MA0157.10.810597
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.328286
MA0160.11.46233
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.0383129
MA0163.10.0270301
MA0164.10.738243
MA0080.22.70673
MA0018.20.709805
MA0099.20.629739
MA0079.20.000444266
MA0102.21.58513
MA0258.11.43672
MA0259.10.336472
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BCLAF1#9774621.65264761012189.68736949628703e-097.35275568911861e-07
CEBPB#105167.971147625824823.89609159898068e-060.000127078048252949
ELF1#199764.258097958807540.0001677224776288830.00205354839872016
ELK4#2005616.2356816584685.45305335722442e-083.44532026361259e-06
EP300#203366.77394172622321.03454107484288e-050.000269981097739919
FOXA1#3169611.08141974938555.39600313513231e-072.50914145783652e-05
FOXA2#3170624.63046375266524.47024549595265e-093.61913154536278e-07
HDAC2#3066613.41562023662631.71355402088576e-079.4339414015439e-06
HEY1#2346264.040111043105710.0002298968555807510.00253486039907074
HNF4A#3172623.13229036295376.51490260560877e-095.14293207276776e-07
HNF4G#3174628.75342252644681.76556713337063e-091.54304657608448e-07
MAX#414966.452555509007121.3848964723355e-050.00033465340739067
MEF2A#4205618.74323090964412.30307332780908e-081.62961162115889e-06
NFKB1#479065.488063424193843.65870229532191e-050.00070787552615992
PAX5#507966.669565531177831.13557256338955e-050.000290041728901543
POLR2A#543062.147453176558070.01019570676818780.0380731342664033
PRDM1#6396131.8309557774611.88485626211077e-132.86539305907695e-11
SIN3A#2594265.408884726815143.99207083571449e-050.00074345200786588
SP1#666765.69838137814092.91961319085282e-050.00060996495707037
SRF#6722613.79717826216781.44812893459755e-078.1796180530251e-06
STAT1#6772620.70658749719921.2666425711927e-089.3953752480678e-07
STAT2#6773665.26377118644071.28736137622248e-111.59490788578054e-09
STAT3#6774610.51946499715427.37398960627247e-073.27020000207852e-05
TAF1#687263.343046285745290.0007162474284635620.00573783578900867
TBP#690863.706770687096390.000385416472907960.0037813537824363
TCF7L2#6934610.77017656313736.40204410218762e-072.91466034868515e-05
TRIM28#10155618.59052504526252.41896703530258e-081.697812487903e-06



Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.
Analyst:NA

link to data source
data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.