Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2102

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2102_amniotic_cervical_Placental_chorionic_Hep2_salivary_Corneal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr11:119994643..119994655,- p10@TRIM29
Hg19::chr11:119999506..119999529,- p7@TRIM29
Hg19::chr11:119999539..119999579,- p3@TRIM29
Hg19::chr11:119999611..119999625,- p9@TRIM29


Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset
data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset
data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset

cell_data
uberon_data
disease_data


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial cell1.92e-18253
endo-epithelial cell2.90e-1442
epithelial cell of alimentary canal4.62e-1120
endodermal cell3.81e-1058
general ecto-epithelial cell7.52e-0814
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
endoderm-derived structure9.91e-20160
endoderm9.91e-20160
presumptive endoderm9.91e-20160
respiratory system4.83e-1774
digestive system6.17e-14145
digestive tract6.17e-14145
primitive gut6.17e-14145
respiratory tract1.72e-1354
subdivision of digestive tract3.27e-12118
larynx4.26e-129
extraembryonic membrane9.40e-1214
membranous layer9.40e-1214
upper respiratory tract1.48e-1119
foregut7.63e-1187
respiratory primordium2.01e-1038
endoderm of foregut2.01e-1038
segment of respiratory tract9.37e-1047
orifice1.09e-0936
organ1.77e-09503
chorion7.09e-097
organ part1.78e-08218
oral opening1.93e-0822
surface structure8.64e-0899
organ system subdivision3.18e-07223
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
carcinoma2.73e-12106
cell type cancer2.54e-07143
squamous cell carcinoma3.14e-0714


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs
data

Jaspar motifs
data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.720743
MA0004.10.71247
MA0006.10.532262
MA0007.10.6918
MA0009.11.20602
MA0014.10.244769
MA0017.10.577281
MA0019.10.873355
MA0024.11.09684
MA0025.11.34373
MA0027.12.83281
MA0028.10.550763
MA0029.11.11704
MA0030.11.10506
MA0031.11.03735
MA0038.10.824639
MA0040.11.12314
MA0041.10.732902
MA0042.10.697662
MA0043.11.20635
MA0046.11.19471
MA0048.10.25531
MA0050.10.69864
MA0051.11.91805
MA0052.11.12718
MA0055.11.28887
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.248209
MA0058.10.605914
MA0059.10.604454
MA0060.10.393285
MA0061.10.360128
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.825101
MA0067.11.53181
MA0068.10.313194
MA0069.11.19071
MA0070.11.17908
MA0071.10.782546
MA0072.11.1744
MA0073.10.0343867
MA0074.10.819248
MA0076.10.623864
MA0077.12.62367
MA0078.12.13662
MA0081.10.604638
MA0083.11.21381
MA0084.11.72172
MA0087.11.17185
MA0088.10.182167
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.640115
MA0091.10.715356
MA0092.10.673508
MA0093.10.535768
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.83965
MA0101.10.539569
MA0103.10.521546
MA0105.10.232357
MA0106.10.869173
MA0107.10.453492
MA0108.21.03412
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.655276
MA0113.10.886811
MA0114.10.447443
MA0115.11.45393
MA0116.12.01976
MA0117.11.24497
MA0119.10.586221
MA0122.11.27173
MA0124.11.41151
MA0125.11.32534
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.94608
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.23748
MA0136.10.832277
MA0139.10.344952
MA0140.11.83481
MA0141.10.602484
MA0142.11.00381
MA0143.10.887001
MA0144.10.430413
MA0145.14.94783
MA0146.10.061409
MA0147.10.46175
MA0148.10.739888
MA0149.10.769072
MA0062.20.353589
MA0035.20.778873
MA0039.20.10559
MA0138.20.928035
MA0002.20.379056
MA0137.22.35208
MA0104.20.392359
MA0047.20.856092
MA0112.20.187982
MA0065.20.199162
MA0150.10.633493
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.78681
MA0153.11.30799
MA0154.10.229241
MA0155.10.533581
MA0156.10.560797
MA0157.10.97481
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.462502
MA0160.10.756582
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.0928415
MA0163.10.539587
MA0164.10.90014
MA0080.20.535868
MA0018.20.870662
MA0099.20.7872
MA0079.20.00910927
MA0102.21.75932
MA0258.10.418966
MA0259.10.471671
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BRCA1#672315.13817298241780.0004682184421431190.00429968046065112
CEBPB#105135.978360719368610.007153832484726970.0297155912529293
EP300#203335.08045629466740.01144298405398240.0418670103910971
FOXA1#316938.311064812039090.002740138182109850.0150318989180255
GATA3#2625320.42738726790450.0001924415576258320.00231895740589411
JUN#372539.384621894252250.001918994502030470.0112809786557222
MAX#414934.839416631755340.01315737137836840.046589005234291
MXI1#460137.471178721569470.003741314738550960.0186190398351055
NR3C1#2908311.22976749837980.001131672068063850.00775173470955079
RFX5#599339.035933120396320.002144561191324070.0123798267886743
SMARCB1#6598313.68953683586810.0006305783409379340.00517947081000526
SMC3#9126311.28369963369960.001115802366868050.00765407444291184
STAT1#6772315.52994062289940.000434088655175550.00404747656975977
STAT3#677437.889598747865680.003190760481680130.0167381502810885
TFAP2A#7020416.5186343730451.34240829060362e-050.000325970191728322
TFAP2C#7022410.80922860986027.32289634782688e-050.0011437056552575



Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.
Analyst:NA

link to data source
data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.