Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2486

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2486_optic_Adipocyte_aorta_embryonic_diencephalon_basal_corpus



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr19:38743538..38743565,+ p@chr19:38743538..38743565
+
Hg19::chr19:38746979..38747050,- p1@PPP1R14A
Hg19::chr19:38747153..38747169,- p3@PPP1R14A
Hg19::chr19:38747174..38747218,- p2@PPP1R14A


Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset
data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset
data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset


uberon_data


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism1.12e-39114
neural plate6.60e-2382
presumptive neural plate6.60e-2382
neural tube9.45e-2356
neural rod9.45e-2356
future spinal cord9.45e-2356
neural keel9.45e-2356
ecto-epithelium1.72e-21104
regional part of nervous system3.51e-2153
regional part of brain3.51e-2153
neurectoderm1.31e-2086
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest4.55e-19132
central nervous system3.29e-1881
nervous system2.90e-1789
regional part of forebrain1.15e-1641
forebrain1.15e-1641
anterior neural tube1.15e-1641
future forebrain1.15e-1641
pre-chordal neural plate1.98e-1661
anatomical cluster2.07e-16373
brain2.26e-1668
future brain2.26e-1668
telencephalon1.10e-1534
brain grey matter1.16e-1534
gray matter1.16e-1534
ectoderm-derived structure2.74e-15171
ectoderm2.74e-15171
presumptive ectoderm2.74e-15171
cell layer4.22e-15309
multi-tissue structure4.32e-15342
epithelium1.51e-14306
regional part of telencephalon2.10e-1432
cerebral hemisphere2.38e-1432
tube2.95e-14192
anatomical conduit1.23e-13240
organ system subdivision5.20e-13223
organ part3.38e-12218
cerebral cortex1.61e-1025
pallium1.61e-1025
regional part of cerebral cortex1.74e-1022
neocortex1.79e-0920
multi-cellular organism9.24e-09656
compound organ9.20e-0868
anatomical space2.34e-0795
embryo2.42e-07592
posterior neural tube2.55e-0715
chordal neural plate2.55e-0715
neural nucleus7.68e-079
nucleus of brain7.68e-079
organ9.64e-07503


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs
data

Jaspar motifs
data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.11.8989
MA0004.10.71247
MA0006.11.31813
MA0007.11.65296
MA0009.11.20602
MA0014.10.0695829
MA0017.10.577281
MA0019.10.873355
MA0024.11.09684
MA0025.11.34373
MA0027.12.83281
MA0028.10.550763
MA0029.11.11704
MA0030.11.10506
MA0031.11.03735
MA0038.10.824639
MA0040.11.12314
MA0041.11.73823
MA0042.10.697662
MA0043.11.20635
MA0046.11.19471
MA0048.10.25531
MA0050.10.69864
MA0051.10.820063
MA0052.11.12718
MA0055.10.125954
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.248209
MA0058.10.605914
MA0059.10.604454
MA0060.10.393285
MA0061.10.360128
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.825101
MA0067.11.53181
MA0068.10.313194
MA0069.11.19071
MA0070.11.17908
MA0071.10.782546
MA0072.11.1744
MA0073.18.301
MA0074.10.819248
MA0076.10.623864
MA0077.11.16637
MA0078.10.926725
MA0081.10.604638
MA0083.11.21381
MA0084.11.72172
MA0087.11.17185
MA0088.10.536981
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.640115
MA0091.10.715356
MA0092.10.673508
MA0093.11.32557
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.83965
MA0101.10.539569
MA0103.10.521546
MA0105.10.656404
MA0106.12.01886
MA0107.10.453492
MA0108.21.03412
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.655276
MA0113.10.886811
MA0114.10.447443
MA0115.11.45393
MA0116.10.457606
MA0117.11.24497
MA0119.10.586221
MA0122.11.27173
MA0124.11.41151
MA0125.11.32534
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.94608
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.23748
MA0136.10.832277
MA0139.10.912459
MA0140.10.779643
MA0141.10.602484
MA0142.11.00381
MA0143.10.887001
MA0144.10.430413
MA0145.10.569905
MA0146.15.02892
MA0147.10.46175
MA0148.10.739888
MA0149.10.769072
MA0062.20.353589
MA0035.20.778873
MA0039.25.64763
MA0138.20.928035
MA0002.20.379056
MA0137.20.558189
MA0104.20.392359
MA0047.20.856092
MA0112.20.551048
MA0065.20.199162
MA0150.10.633493
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.78681
MA0153.11.30799
MA0154.10.229241
MA0155.10.533581
MA0156.10.560797
MA0157.10.97481
MA0158.10
MA0159.11.1691
MA0160.10.756582
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.640035
MA0163.10.918944
MA0164.10.90014
MA0080.20.535868
MA0018.20.870662
MA0099.20.7872
MA0079.24.43857
MA0102.21.75932
MA0258.10.418966
MA0259.10.471671
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCFL#140690314.80985576923080.0004996291767563340.00440902168071438
HMGN3#932436.133910792512940.006640696683324720.0282953661992473
NR3C1#2908311.22976749837980.001131672068063850.00775478637336926
NRF1#489939.157709585783180.002061953791733420.0119624703952254
RAD21#588537.766275421592250.0033411193858720.0172675755909089
SMC3#9126311.28369963369960.001115802366868050.00765658892203238
ZBTB7A#5134135.513931980906920.009038352821081090.0342459922464406



Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.
Analyst:NA

link to data source
data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.