Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3173

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3173_CD4_CD14_CD8_Natural_Peripheral_Chondrocyte_CD19



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr11:62608867..62608952,- p@chr11:62608867..62608952
-
Hg19::chr16:3314414..3314469,- p@chr16:3314414..3314469
-
Hg19::chr18:3449633..3449649,- p@chr18:3449633..3449649
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset
data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset
data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset

cell_data
uberon_data


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte3.08e-25136
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell4.81e-24120
nongranular leukocyte5.53e-23115
classical monocyte2.55e-2142
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte2.55e-2142
hematopoietic stem cell1.81e-18168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.81e-18168
hematopoietic cell3.71e-17177
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell4.32e-16161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell4.32e-16161
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell4.59e-1552
defensive cell6.37e-1548
phagocyte6.37e-1548
nucleate cell1.77e-1455
lymphocyte3.57e-1453
common lymphoid progenitor3.57e-1453
mature alpha-beta T cell2.18e-1018
alpha-beta T cell2.18e-1018
immature T cell2.18e-1018
mature T cell2.18e-1018
immature alpha-beta T cell2.18e-1018
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.67e-0966
myeloid leukocyte3.73e-0972
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell4.66e-0967
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor4.87e-0961
T cell1.37e-0825
pro-T cell1.37e-0825
monopoietic cell2.08e-0859
monocyte2.08e-0859
monoblast2.08e-0859
promonocyte2.08e-0859
B cell3.38e-0714
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system3.95e-0998
blood island3.95e-0998
bone element2.51e-0882
bone marrow2.70e-0876
hemolymphoid system1.21e-07108
skeletal system1.76e-07100
immune system3.07e-0793
skeletal element4.85e-0790


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs
data

Jaspar motifs
data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.178364
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.12.61424
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.10.118426
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.10.658629
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.341392
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.10.190716
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.333427
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.11.23283
MA0061.10.456531
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.12.75836
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.11.36698
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.10.715722
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.10.31555
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.10.560723
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.11.31729
MA0145.10.273764
MA0146.10.348055
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.12.04956
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.20.757898
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.20.476938
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.20.491226
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.20.264678
MA0065.20.277623
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.838867
MA0155.10.256269
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.8915
MA0163.10.776149
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.20.941469
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BRF2#552901358.1918604651160.002789217733358720.0152754646488857
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.0320572385584033
ELF1#199734.258097958807540.01295179875054610.0460218055834337
ESRRA#21011161.2801047120420.006187620080219560.0273466570842559
IRF4#3662214.60967512449610.006056122473217890.0268097395295186
KAT2A#26481205.3633333333330.004861545220737780.0227520577750777
MAX#414936.452555509007120.003721913834265510.018583590330203
MEF2A#4205212.4954872730960.008235029478029740.0324746353895162
MYC#460935.22228187160940.007020843755740150.0293276498282436
PBX3#5090214.60967512449610.006056122473217890.0268108759688188
POU5F1#54601111.8130671506350.008916911055111830.0338202089513664
PPARGC1A#108911116.6837121212120.008545763211786680.0325626970730705
SETDB1#9869226.8800174520070.001814468907964410.010890880360856
SIN3A#2594235.408884726815140.006318961977991520.0275528586347469
SMC3#9126210.02995522995520.0126656379767470.0457142163620915
SP2#6668217.43568699589640.004273568481769740.0203088328100992
SREBF2#67211145.6477541371160.006850215514569990.0290435455740744
STAT1#6772213.80439166479950.006770931708444080.0287447395105155
TCF7L2#6934310.77017656313730.0008003181298398380.00611891838670153
TFAP2A#7020211.01242291536330.01054990655215560.0389942557474725
XRCC4#751811432.767441860460.0006977913838891460.00561193857554278



Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.
Analyst:NA

link to data source
data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.