Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3689

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3689_brain_amygdala_temporal_duodenum_insula_putamen_Mesenchymal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr17:7608489..7608500,+ p3@EFNB3
Hg19::chr17:7608511..7608538,+ p1@EFNB3
Hg19::chr17:7608540..7608553,+ p2@EFNB3


Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset
data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset
data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset

cell_data
uberon_data


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
neurectodermal cell6.47e-1359
ectodermal cell2.01e-1172
neural cell2.02e-0825
migratory neural crest cell5.98e-0841
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
central nervous system1.75e-2881
nervous system9.40e-2889
ectoderm-derived structure2.43e-26171
ectoderm2.43e-26171
presumptive ectoderm2.43e-26171
neurectoderm2.28e-2386
brain9.67e-2368
future brain9.67e-2368
neural plate2.09e-2182
presumptive neural plate2.09e-2182
regional part of nervous system2.69e-2053
regional part of brain2.69e-2053
neural tube3.16e-2056
neural rod3.16e-2056
future spinal cord3.16e-2056
neural keel3.16e-2056
ecto-epithelium1.41e-19104
cerebral hemisphere1.65e-1932
pre-chordal neural plate1.81e-1961
telencephalon6.98e-1934
regional part of forebrain1.97e-1841
forebrain1.97e-1841
anterior neural tube1.97e-1841
future forebrain1.97e-1841
brain grey matter2.30e-1834
gray matter2.30e-1834
regional part of telencephalon1.11e-1732
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest3.25e-17132
organ system subdivision1.72e-16223
anatomical cluster5.18e-16373
cerebral cortex1.50e-1525
pallium1.50e-1525
regional part of cerebral cortex5.51e-1522
cell layer9.16e-15309
epithelium2.76e-14306
neocortex8.95e-1420
multi-tissue structure1.46e-11342
organ part6.03e-11218
tube1.30e-10192
embryo1.58e-08592
multi-cellular organism3.93e-08656
anatomical conduit7.05e-08240
developing anatomical structure3.50e-07581


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs
data

Jaspar motifs
data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.12.05336
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.15.56064
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.10.658629
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.341392
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.10.190716
MA0056.10
MA0057.13.3282
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.10.456531
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.10.405474
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.15.87909
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.12.03569
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.11.55947
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.10.31555
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.10.560723
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.10.273764
MA0146.10.707589
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.22.74132
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.20.476938
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.20.491226
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.20.264678
MA0065.20.277623
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.312019
MA0155.11.31345
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.8915
MA0163.13.19905
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.24.62164
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
EP300#203336.77394172622320.003216880500103790.016737297989854
JUND#372736.994663941871030.002921845042734990.0156626071148283
RAD21#5885310.35503389545630.0009004912073565420.00663607121119883
SIN3A#2594235.408884726815140.006318961977991520.0276428780271197
SP1#666735.69838137814090.005403962701712170.0246284020162383
YY1#752834.911170749853860.008441455341808260.0329047570053041



Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.
Analyst:NA

link to data source
data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.