Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3706

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3706_temporal_duodenum_occipital_Neural_mucinous_parietal_Neurons



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr18:12657866..12657958,- p2@SPIRE1
Hg19::chr18:12657964..12657987,- p3@SPIRE1
Hg19::chr18:12657988..12658128,- p1@SPIRE1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset
data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset
data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset


uberon_data


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
neural tube3.74e-2656
neural rod3.74e-2656
future spinal cord3.74e-2656
neural keel3.74e-2656
central nervous system3.86e-2581
nervous system5.77e-2589
regional part of nervous system1.68e-2453
regional part of brain1.68e-2453
brain3.47e-2268
future brain3.47e-2268
regional part of forebrain1.50e-2141
forebrain1.50e-2141
anterior neural tube1.50e-2141
future forebrain1.50e-2141
multi-cellular organism2.38e-21656
anatomical system3.01e-21624
anatomical group4.08e-21625
neural plate1.76e-2082
presumptive neural plate1.76e-2082
brain grey matter5.72e-1934
gray matter5.72e-1934
telencephalon6.04e-1934
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest2.92e-18132
neurectoderm3.34e-1886
organ4.60e-18503
regional part of telencephalon9.32e-1832
cerebral hemisphere9.77e-1832
embryo4.91e-17592
developing anatomical structure1.69e-16581
ecto-epithelium1.82e-16104
pre-chordal neural plate2.56e-1661
adult organism6.84e-16114
ectoderm-derived structure2.33e-15171
ectoderm2.33e-15171
presumptive ectoderm2.33e-15171
embryonic structure1.59e-14564
germ layer2.41e-14560
germ layer / neural crest2.41e-14560
embryonic tissue2.41e-14560
presumptive structure2.41e-14560
germ layer / neural crest derived structure2.41e-14560
epiblast (generic)2.41e-14560
cerebral cortex4.70e-1425
pallium4.70e-1425
regional part of cerebral cortex7.19e-1422
neocortex9.46e-1320
tube1.61e-12192
anatomical cluster3.37e-12373
anatomical conduit3.66e-12240
organ system subdivision1.36e-10223
epithelium3.25e-08306
cell layer3.85e-08309
multi-tissue structure2.13e-07342


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs
data

Jaspar motifs
data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.15.30359
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.16.45108
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.11.58389
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.904546
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.10.190716
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.333427
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.10.456531
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.10.405474
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.10.990225
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.10.257905
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.10.31555
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.15.93331
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.11.12079
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.10.752137
MA0146.10.348055
MA0147.11.38767
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.21.141
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.25.50873
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.20.476938
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.21.2307
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.20.264678
MA0065.20.277623
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.838867
MA0155.10.256269
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.455568
MA0163.11.2663
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.24.62164
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.0279236986307183
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0325053098650114
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.0321895156920866
ELF1#199734.258097958807540.01295179875054610.0461883804448639
JUND#372736.994663941871030.002921845042734990.0156650192206468
REST#597839.650028716128020.001112636247114590.00766963349035712
TFAP2A#7020316.5186343730450.0002218033880766340.0024815130206037
TFAP2C#7022310.80922860986020.0007916746575753130.00615557694777458
YY1#752834.911170749853860.008441455341808260.0329084417485298
ZBTB7A#5134137.35190930787590.002516255860282270.014007528692075



Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.
Analyst:NA

link to data source
data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.