Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4334

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4334_Small_Placental_salivary_Pericytes_Urothelial_astrocytoma_Esophageal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr3:48632723..48632770,- p1@COL7A1
Hg19::chr3:48632784..48632795,- p2@COL7A1
Hg19::chr3:48633003..48633029,- p3@COL7A1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset
data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset
data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset

cell_data
uberon_data


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
surface structure1.39e-1299
endoderm-derived structure2.46e-11160
endoderm2.46e-11160
presumptive endoderm2.46e-11160
mouth1.27e-0829
stomodeum1.27e-0829
organ1.42e-08503
respiratory system2.23e-0874
mouth mucosa1.42e-0713
head2.03e-0756
subdivision of head2.56e-0749
extraembryonic membrane2.90e-0714
membranous layer2.90e-0714
anterior region of body3.26e-0762
craniocervical region3.26e-0762
oral opening5.17e-0722
organ component layer6.28e-0766
digestive system8.52e-07145
digestive tract8.52e-07145
primitive gut8.52e-07145


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs
data

Jaspar motifs
data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.708947
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.10.377374
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.10.658629
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.12.16573
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.341392
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.10.557638
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.333427
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.14.06645
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.12.75836
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.19.66582
MA0074.13.54511
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.12.96495
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.10.257905
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.12.63873
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.13.21605
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.13.44314
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.11.35563
MA0115.13.45103
MA0116.10.560723
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.11.31729
MA0145.10.273764
MA0146.10.107247
MA0147.11.38767
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.23.37171
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.20.476938
MA0137.23.92311
MA0104.20.491226
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.20.731309
MA0065.20.760954
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.312019
MA0155.10.711948
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.13.34615
MA0161.10
MA0162.11.43223
MA0163.10.776149
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.26.90173
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.11.29138
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
FOS#235338.99795530889440.001372499272417130.0090010958563248
FOSL1#8061339.7135797163731.59554825631833e-050.000371958625762568
FOSL2#2355316.93020060456170.0002060162053171620.00243670741416977
HDAC2#3066313.41562023662630.0004140761399857210.00392607335306116
JUN#3725312.51282919233630.0005103313992726250.00445453414196688
JUNB#3726220.40708843988080.003131462199438740.0164527005054423
JUND#372736.994663941871030.002921845042734990.0157271851991032
NR3C1#2908314.9730233311730.0002978331194675480.00309660459572636
SMARCB1#6598318.25271578115740.000164397760679890.00203575263548103
SMARCC1#6599343.66335931963151.20046018043203e-050.000302253762739009
SMARCC2#6601394.15537442689761.19621075407887e-064.86491646983033e-05
SMC3#9126315.04493284493280.0002935825420371870.00310181761333553



Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.
Analyst:NA

link to data source
data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.