Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C698

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C698_Smooth_Adipocyte_Fibroblast_Preadipocyte_Olfactory_Ewing_basal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr13:102104716..102104735,+ p5@ITGBL1
Hg19::chr13:102104738..102104747,+ p11@ITGBL1
Hg19::chr13:102104920..102104936,+ p4@ITGBL1
Hg19::chr13:102104952..102104959,+ p6@ITGBL1
Hg19::chr13:102104980..102105050,+ p1@ITGBL1
Hg19::chr13:102105055..102105060,+ p7@ITGBL1
Hg19::chr13:102105062..102105085,+ p2@ITGBL1
Hg19::chr13:102105089..102105094,+ p8@ITGBL1
Hg19::chr13:102105139..102105150,+ p3@ITGBL1
Hg19::chr13:102220045..102220071,+ p@chr13:102220045..102220071
+
Hg19::chr13:102235656..102235669,+ p@chr13:102235656..102235669
+
Hg19::chr13:102359103..102359116,+ p9@ITGBL1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset
data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset
data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset

cell_data
uberon_data


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
fibroblast1.23e-2976
skin fibroblast1.73e-1323
multi fate stem cell7.69e-12427
preadipocyte1.12e-1112
somatic stem cell3.73e-11433
stem cell2.78e-10441
connective tissue cell5.27e-08361
muscle precursor cell1.27e-0758
myoblast1.27e-0758
multi-potent skeletal muscle stem cell1.27e-0758
stromal cell1.45e-0728
non-terminally differentiated cell2.33e-07106
mesenchymal cell5.62e-07354
somatic cell6.96e-07588
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
surface structure5.55e-1299
integument3.66e-1046
integumental system3.66e-1046
connective tissue6.86e-09371
skin of body2.28e-0841
omentum2.75e-086
peritoneum2.75e-086
abdominal cavity2.75e-086
visceral peritoneum2.75e-086
systemic artery8.14e-0833
systemic arterial system8.14e-0833
dense mesenchyme tissue1.44e-0773
somite2.43e-0771
presomitic mesoderm2.43e-0771
presumptive segmental plate2.43e-0771
dermomyotome2.43e-0771
trunk paraxial mesoderm2.43e-0771
paraxial mesoderm4.13e-0772
presumptive paraxial mesoderm4.13e-0772
multilaminar epithelium5.21e-0783


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs
data

Jaspar motifs
data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.00251029
MA0004.10.32225
MA0006.10.188769
MA0007.10.305951
MA0009.10.756202
MA0014.10.00141144
MA0017.10.220105
MA0019.10.45566
MA0024.10.654931
MA0025.10.886436
MA0027.12.35633
MA0028.10.201461
MA0029.10.673506
MA0030.10.662482
MA0031.10.600685
MA0038.10.414169
MA0040.11.62663
MA0041.10.89827
MA0042.10.310552
MA0043.10.756508
MA0046.10.745626
MA0048.10.0399193
MA0050.10.311321
MA0051.10.410316
MA0052.10.682867
MA0055.10.901232
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.147728
MA0058.10.240796
MA0059.10.239727
MA0060.10.103131
MA0061.10.0856761
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.414559
MA0067.11.06751
MA0068.10.491198
MA0069.10.741884
MA0070.10.731026
MA0071.10.379038
MA0072.10.726666
MA0073.10.00203399
MA0074.10.40963
MA0076.10.254045
MA0077.10.719193
MA0078.10.502027
MA0081.10.239862
MA0083.10.763502
MA0084.11.25286
MA0087.10.724294
MA0088.10.0178242
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.266215
MA0091.16.39323
MA0092.10.291716
MA0093.10.191154
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.426863
MA0101.10.19375
MA0103.10.181541
MA0105.10.0320473
MA0106.10.452066
MA0107.10.137948
MA0108.20.597764
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.277713
MA0113.10.467266
MA0114.10.134281
MA0115.10.992167
MA0116.11.37961
MA0117.10.792789
MA0119.10.226505
MA0122.10.818044
MA0124.10.951337
MA0125.10.868909
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.519055
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.10.785738
MA0136.10.420617
MA0139.11.43544
MA0140.10.376643
MA0141.10.238287
MA0142.10.570448
MA0143.10.467429
MA0144.10.124153
MA0145.10.0932202
MA0146.10.000996775
MA0147.10.143012
MA0148.10.344198
MA0149.10.367947
MA0062.20.0823902
MA0035.20.376007
MA0039.20.431698
MA0138.24.33455
MA0002.20.316618
MA0137.20.20663
MA0104.20.102626
MA0047.20.440861
MA0112.20.216805
MA0065.20.0221687
MA0150.10.261236
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.382565
MA0153.10.852412
MA0154.10.0310431
MA0155.10.0793743
MA0156.10.208455
MA0157.10.544523
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.143477
MA0160.10.357736
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.00310762
MA0163.10.00158421
MA0164.10.478818
MA0080.20.558855
MA0018.20.453345
MA0099.20.382887
MA0079.20.00122012
MA0102.21.28978
MA0258.10.117513
MA0259.10.149181
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.
Analyst:NA

link to data source
data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.