Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1534

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 13:53, 5 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1534_gastric_signet_endometrial_pharyngeal_papillotubular_bile_squamous



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr7:116312178..116312192,+p7@MET
Hg19::chr7:116312193..116312211,+p5@MET
Hg19::chr7:116312213..116312230,+p3@MET
Hg19::chr7:116312243..116312256,+p2@MET
Hg19::chr7:116312277..116312288,+p8@MET
Hg19::chr7:116312308..116312319,+p9@MET


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial cell1.52e-39254
endo-epithelial cell7.30e-1243
endodermal cell1.31e-1159
embryonic cell5.18e-11248
squamous epithelial cell3.24e-0962
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
endoderm-derived structure2.09e-17169
endoderm2.09e-17169
presumptive endoderm2.09e-17169
anatomical system4.40e-14625
anatomical group5.13e-14626
digestive system9.93e-14155
digestive tract9.93e-14155
primitive gut9.93e-14155
mixed endoderm/mesoderm-derived structure1.11e-13130
multi-cellular organism6.81e-13659
subdivision of digestive tract9.99e-13129
endodermal part of digestive tract9.99e-13129
organ1.12e-11511
mesenchyme8.79e-11238
entire embryonic mesenchyme8.79e-11238
multi-tissue structure9.47e-11347
organ part9.55e-10219
respiratory primordium1.57e-0938
endoderm of foregut1.57e-0938
embryonic structure2.17e-09605
developing anatomical structure2.17e-09605
embryo3.24e-09612
germ layer3.54e-09604
embryonic tissue3.54e-09604
presumptive structure3.54e-09604
epiblast (generic)3.54e-09604
foregut5.08e-0998
respiratory tract6.73e-0953
endo-epithelium1.51e-0882
respiratory system2.07e-0872
trunk region element2.36e-08107
organism subdivision5.28e-08365
epithelium2.56e-07309
cell layer4.76e-07312
extraembryonic membrane7.77e-0714
membranous layer7.77e-0714
epithelial fold8.57e-0751
epithelial bud9.99e-0737
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
carcinoma2.05e-18106
cell type cancer4.62e-17143
adenocarcinoma1.11e-0725


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BHLHE40#8553644.87181354697741.22070649245094e-101.31161898523748e-08
CTCF#1066465.360256373075034.21437267579784e-050.000756262659600774
E2F1#186964.907389214879327.15746523583771e-050.00112798930400733
E2F6#187665.017155731697396.26776799983417e-050.00102521444343724
EGR1#195864.988179094810146.48943962979974e-050.00105552185873953
EP300#203366.77394172622321.03454107484288e-050.000270048576144752
FOS#235368.99795530889441.88302066097805e-066.94669003221076e-05
JUND#372766.994663941871038.53468650061654e-060.00023242610780649
MAX#414966.452555509007121.3848964723355e-050.000334730855529386
MXI1#460169.96157162875931.02262624227062e-064.3047989567312e-05
MYC#460965.22228187160944.92821127172503e-050.00085469521256674
NR3C1#2908614.9730233311738.86442195171695e-085.24825036403269e-06
POLR2A#543062.147453176558070.01019570676818780.0380744956256576
RAD21#5885610.35503389545638.10515055094479e-073.54626652027701e-05
SMC3#9126615.04493284493288.61317699636729e-085.12857236216421e-06
TAF1#687263.343046285745290.0007162474284635620.00573827594210693
TCF7L2#6934610.77017656313736.40204410218762e-072.91593146091745e-05
TFAP2A#7020616.5186343730454.91595718330683e-083.16143874548881e-06
TFAP2C#7022610.80922860986026.2644941908553e-072.8670355337368e-05
USF1#739166.361499277207961.50818327938273e-050.000357091710531519
USF2#7392612.99219738506962.07721573629339e-071.11423900504748e-05



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.