Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1820

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 02:52, 17 September 2013 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1820_amniotic_Corneal_Urothelial_smallcell_Alveolar_endometrial_choriocarcinoma



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr19:38755147..38755158,+ p6@SPINT2
Hg19::chr19:38755167..38755180,+ p4@SPINT2
Hg19::chr19:38755184..38755193,+ p7@SPINT2
Hg19::chr19:38755203..38755228,+ p1@SPINT2
Hg19::chr19:38755237..38755321,+ p2@SPINT2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset
data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset
data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset

cell_data
uberon_data
disease_data


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial cell2.15e-15253
endo-epithelial cell6.56e-1442
endodermal cell7.03e-0958
kidney tubule cell3.17e-0710
nephron tubule epithelial cell3.17e-0710
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
renal system4.21e-1048
urinary system structure4.94e-1047
adult organism3.13e-09114
anatomical space6.23e-0995
organ1.46e-08503
trunk region element3.66e-08101
nephron tubule epithelium3.17e-0710
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
carcinoma8.87e-11106
adenocarcinoma2.88e-0925


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs
data

Jaspar motifs
data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.737422
MA0004.10.626788
MA0006.10.452993
MA0007.10.606704
MA0009.11.11255
MA0014.14.38573
MA0017.13.17413
MA0019.10.784036
MA0024.11.00439
MA0025.11.24931
MA0027.12.73598
MA0028.10.470679
MA0029.11.02437
MA0030.11.01252
MA0031.10.945567
MA0038.10.736268
MA0040.11.03042
MA0041.10.64667
MA0042.10.612397
MA0043.11.11288
MA0046.11.10134
MA0048.13.196
MA0050.10.613347
MA0051.10.731787
MA0052.11.03442
MA0055.10.0853006
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.189508
MA0058.10.523638
MA0059.10.522232
MA0060.10.321781
MA0061.10.291022
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.736721
MA0067.11.43651
MA0068.10.247962
MA0069.11.09737
MA0070.11.08584
MA0071.10.695094
MA0072.11.0812
MA0073.10.111822
MA0074.10.730989
MA0076.10.540943
MA0077.11.07324
MA0078.10.836493
MA0081.10.522409
MA0083.11.12028
MA0084.11.62584
MA0087.11.07867
MA0088.11.3271
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.556637
MA0091.10.629594
MA0092.10.588959
MA0093.10.456342
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.12.96921
MA0101.10.459973
MA0103.13.98633
MA0105.10.175503
MA0106.15.8503
MA0107.10.378225
MA0108.20.94238
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.5713
MA0113.10.797251
MA0114.13.56849
MA0115.11.35895
MA0116.11.76306
MA0117.11.1512
MA0119.10.504689
MA0122.11.17777
MA0124.11.31673
MA0125.11.23103
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.855546
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.14377
MA0136.10.743749
MA0139.12.13391
MA0140.10.692258
MA0141.10.520334
MA0142.10.912455
MA0143.10.797437
MA0144.10.938075
MA0145.10.143698
MA0146.10.946108
MA0147.11.00307
MA0148.10.653474
MA0149.10.681935
MA0062.20.284987
MA0035.20.691506
MA0039.211.0749
MA0138.20.837782
MA0002.20.83106
MA0137.21.20193
MA0104.20.320919
MA0047.20.767096
MA0112.21.96224
MA0065.21.41695
MA0150.10.550239
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.69926
MA0153.11.21379
MA0154.11.57192
MA0155.11.91168
MA0156.10.480289
MA0157.10.883854
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.386729
MA0160.10.669748
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.0592265
MA0163.10.168633
MA0164.10.810347
MA0080.20.456437
MA0018.20.781393
MA0099.20.699641
MA0079.27.22083
MA0102.21.66336
MA0258.10.345771
MA0259.10.395396
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186943.925911371903460.007214984547106360.0298781035335147
EGR1#195854.988179094810140.0003237398000590710.00330832299201266
ELF1#199754.258097958807540.0007142416939776840.00573320177367884
GABPB1#255345.654147068945740.001776696502096670.0109093071892806
MYC#460955.22228187160940.0002573944848850610.00276535568428257
NRF1#4899512.21027944771093.68220991173981e-060.000120667185745903
STAT3#6774510.51946499715427.759040745861e-060.000220382501076143
TAF1#687253.343046285745290.002394600090870310.0135410492658186
TAF7#6879511.43306940492395.11611886715123e-060.000157385077574789
TBP#690853.706770687096390.001428755106721120.00919054906324509
ZEB1#6935516.88843201754397.27243686732534e-073.23202567653869e-05
ZNF263#1012758.221841637010682.6606316672286e-050.000571168983954138



Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.
Analyst:NA

link to data source
data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.