Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3243: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{Coexpression_clusters |full_id=C3243_occipital_temporal_pons_paracentral_insula_parietal_postcentral |id=C3243 }}")
 
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
|full_id=C3243_occipital_temporal_pons_paracentral_insula_parietal_postcentral
|full_id=C3243_occipital_temporal_pons_paracentral_insula_parietal_postcentral
|id=C3243
|id=C3243
|ontology_enrichment_celltype=CL:0002319!7.37e-10!25;CL:0000133!1.53e-09!59;CL:0000333!1.76e-08!41
|ontology_enrichment_disease=DOID:0050687!7.22e-20!143;DOID:305!1.22e-15!106;DOID:14566!6.30e-14!239;DOID:162!1.11e-13!235
|ontology_enrichment_uberon=UBERON:0000073!6.33e-39!94;UBERON:0001016!6.33e-39!94;UBERON:0005743!4.53e-36!86;UBERON:0001017!2.32e-34!82;UBERON:0000955!3.44e-28!69;UBERON:0006238!3.44e-28!69;UBERON:0002346!7.52e-28!90;UBERON:0001049!7.85e-28!57;UBERON:0005068!7.85e-28!57;UBERON:0006241!7.85e-28!57;UBERON:0007135!7.85e-28!57;UBERON:0003075!8.84e-27!86;UBERON:0007284!8.84e-27!86;UBERON:0002616!8.40e-24!59;UBERON:0003056!1.59e-23!61;UBERON:0002780!3.40e-23!41;UBERON:0001890!3.40e-23!41;UBERON:0006240!3.40e-23!41;UBERON:0000924!1.74e-22!173;UBERON:0006601!1.74e-22!173;UBERON:0003080!9.43e-22!42;UBERON:0004121!1.97e-21!169;UBERON:0000033!8.70e-20!123;UBERON:0000153!1.14e-19!129;UBERON:0007811!1.14e-19!129;UBERON:0001893!1.44e-19!34;UBERON:0002020!2.58e-19!34;UBERON:0003528!2.58e-19!34;UBERON:0002791!6.83e-19!33;UBERON:0001869!1.02e-18!32;UBERON:0000956!8.81e-15!25;UBERON:0000203!8.81e-15!25;UBERON:0002619!2.30e-13!22;UBERON:0001950!2.24e-12!20;UBERON:0000064!1.76e-11!219;UBERON:0000481!1.79e-09!347;UBERON:0000119!1.78e-08!312;UBERON:0000025!2.00e-08!194;UBERON:0000483!3.42e-08!309;UBERON:0000475!4.14e-08!365;UBERON:0000477!8.49e-08!286;UBERON:0003076!2.84e-07!15;UBERON:0003057!2.84e-07!15
}}
}}

Revision as of 14:34, 21 May 2012


Full id: C3243_occipital_temporal_pons_paracentral_insula_parietal_postcentral



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr12:117176090..117176112,+p2@RNFT2
Hg19::chr12:117176113..117176135,+p1@RNFT2
Hg19::chr12:117176138..117176147,+p3@RNFT2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
neural cell7.37e-1025
neurectodermal cell1.53e-0959
migratory neural crest cell1.76e-0841
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
regional part of nervous system6.33e-3994
nervous system6.33e-3994
central nervous system2.32e-3482
brain3.44e-2869
future brain3.44e-2869
neurectoderm7.52e-2890
neural tube7.85e-2857
neural rod7.85e-2857
future spinal cord7.85e-2857
neural keel7.85e-2857
neural plate8.84e-2786
presumptive neural plate8.84e-2786
regional part of brain8.40e-2459
pre-chordal neural plate1.59e-2361
regional part of forebrain3.40e-2341
forebrain3.40e-2341
future forebrain3.40e-2341
ectoderm1.74e-22173
presumptive ectoderm1.74e-22173
anterior neural tube9.43e-2242
ectoderm-derived structure1.97e-21169
head8.70e-20123
anterior region of body1.14e-19129
craniocervical region1.14e-19129
telencephalon1.44e-1934
gray matter2.58e-1934
brain grey matter2.58e-1934
regional part of telencephalon6.83e-1933
cerebral hemisphere1.02e-1832
cerebral cortex8.81e-1525
pallium8.81e-1525
regional part of cerebral cortex2.30e-1322
neocortex2.24e-1220
organ part1.76e-11219
multi-tissue structure1.79e-09347
cell layer1.78e-08312
tube2.00e-08194
epithelium3.42e-08309
organism subdivision4.14e-08365
anatomical cluster8.49e-08286
posterior neural tube2.84e-0715
chordal neural plate2.84e-0715
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
cell type cancer7.22e-20143
carcinoma1.22e-15106
disease of cellular proliferation6.30e-14239
cancer1.11e-13235


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.