Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3679

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 03:30, 17 September 2013 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3679_occipital_cord_postcentral_NK_paracentral_parietal_temporal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr17:74236414..74236423,- p5@RNF157
Hg19::chr17:74236512..74236556,- p2@RNF157
Hg19::chr17:74236559..74236626,- p1@RNF157


Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset
data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset
data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset

cell_data
uberon_data


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
mature alpha-beta T cell8.87e-0818
alpha-beta T cell8.87e-0818
immature T cell8.87e-0818
mature T cell8.87e-0818
immature alpha-beta T cell8.87e-0818
T cell1.33e-0725
pro-T cell1.33e-0725
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
nervous system1.44e-3489
central nervous system1.92e-3281
adult organism2.60e-32114
neural tube3.87e-3156
neural rod3.87e-3156
future spinal cord3.87e-3156
neural keel3.87e-3156
regional part of nervous system1.74e-2953
regional part of brain1.74e-2953
brain1.60e-2768
future brain1.60e-2768
neural plate8.99e-2582
presumptive neural plate8.99e-2582
regional part of forebrain3.34e-2441
forebrain3.34e-2441
anterior neural tube3.34e-2441
future forebrain3.34e-2441
neurectoderm1.29e-2286
telencephalon2.94e-2134
brain grey matter3.27e-2134
gray matter3.27e-2134
pre-chordal neural plate3.19e-2061
cerebral hemisphere3.59e-2032
regional part of telencephalon6.09e-2032
organ system subdivision1.92e-18223
ectoderm-derived structure2.40e-18171
ectoderm2.40e-18171
presumptive ectoderm2.40e-18171
ecto-epithelium8.61e-18104
regional part of cerebral cortex3.25e-1622
cerebral cortex3.31e-1625
pallium3.31e-1625
neocortex6.32e-1520
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest9.58e-14132
organ part2.13e-08218
posterior neural tube4.34e-0815
chordal neural plate4.34e-0815
anatomical cluster3.32e-07373
segmental subdivision of nervous system4.31e-0713


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs
data

Jaspar motifs
data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.19.41405
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.12.61424
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.19.33321
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.10.658629
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.341392
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.11.06172
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.333427
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.15.46492
MA0061.12.01615
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.10.405474
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.10.668628
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.12.03569
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.14.18141
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.10.560723
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.12.11725
MA0146.13.00132
MA0147.12.37462
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.25.50873
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.20.476938
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.23.15214
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.20.264678
MA0065.20.277623
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.312019
MA0155.15.65642
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.14.34338
MA0163.10.387745
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.26.90173
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.11.40979
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0325005277384359
E2F4#1874312.66806031528440.0004917987006298980.00436685635904489
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.0321819991676985
EGR1#195834.988179094810140.008056488137383440.0320354679071079
ESR1#2099220.51240219743630.003099741577095180.016307370067008
FOS#235338.99795530889440.001372499272417130.00896955456554487
HDAC2#3066313.41562023662630.0004140761399857210.00390939233266757
NFYA#4800318.42558069983050.0001598135507814160.00199435624687064
NFYB#4801316.75979325353650.0002123649923296180.00245616693620299
SP1#666735.69838137814090.005403962701712170.024626252753474
SP2#6668326.15353049384465.58768218891694e-050.000939426819266413
USF1#739136.361499277207960.00388404057290560.0190122475343873
ZBTB7A#5134137.35190930787590.002516255860282270.0140045428079946



Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.
Analyst:NA

link to data source
data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.