Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4400

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 03:45, 17 September 2013 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4400_Fibroblast_Preadipocyte_mesodermal_Small_Keratinocyte_Gingival_basal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr4:187647702..187647734,- p4@FAT1
Hg19::chr4:187647737..187647763,- p3@FAT1
Hg19::chr4:187647773..187647864,- p1@FAT1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset
data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset
data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset

cell_data
uberon_data


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
endo-epithelial cell2.11e-1242
endodermal cell1.10e-0958
embryonic cell4.96e-07250
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
surface structure6.42e-1499
organism subdivision5.77e-12264
multi-tissue structure1.41e-10342
endoderm-derived structure5.13e-10160
endoderm5.13e-10160
presumptive endoderm5.13e-10160
digestive system1.32e-08145
digestive tract1.32e-08145
primitive gut1.32e-08145
multi-cellular organism1.87e-08656
orifice1.62e-0736
anatomical system3.88e-07624
anatomical group5.72e-07625
skin of body7.46e-0741
mouth8.72e-0729
stomodeum8.72e-0729


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs
data

Jaspar motifs
data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.13.22681
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.11.24048
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.10.658629
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.341392
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.11.67416
MA0056.10
MA0057.11.59304
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.11.15625
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.10.405474
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.13.923
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.11.31954
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.10.31555
MA0106.13.70241
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.12.36034
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.13.943
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.10.273764
MA0146.10.707589
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.22.74132
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.20.476938
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.20.491226
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.20.264678
MA0065.20.760954
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.312019
MA0155.10.711948
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.8915
MA0163.13.19905
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.23.70709
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.28.15771
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.12.40872
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
ATF3#467322.46317452600878.81932387510763e-050.001299677389858
BCL3#602334.54710280373832.42397750207122e-050.000527741893556006
CCNT2#90536.336201576962630.003930750035764890.0190737166280374
CHD2#1106310.34402283411690.0009033701102746880.00662177645613266
CTBP2#1488362.71700033932814.049570681927e-060.000130173318697991
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.0280670215592422
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0326892885720751
EGR1#195834.988179094810140.008056488137383440.0321861970996936
EP300#203336.77394172622320.003216880500103790.0168067925237789
FOSL2#2355316.93020060456170.0002060162053171620.00243781174565138
JUN#3725312.51282919233630.0005103313992726250.004456023828161
JUND#372736.994663941871030.002921845042734990.0157312390152696
RAD21#5885310.35503389545630.0009004912073565420.00666806588238158
RXRA#6256320.07461713913330.0001235730348432220.00165778345356343
SIN3A#2594235.408884726815140.006318961977991520.0277790154488974
SP1#666735.69838137814090.005403962701712170.0247493624190544
TCF12#6938310.63446490218640.0008313523990202070.00631045956837498
TCF7L2#6934310.77017656313730.0008003181298398380.00616267972884634
TFAP2C#7022310.80922860986020.0007916746575753130.00617857641327964
YY1#752834.911170749853860.008441455341808260.0330639496865854
ZBTB7A#5134137.35190930787590.002516255860282270.0140682679760182



Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.
Analyst:NA

link to data source
data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.