Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C810

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 11:51, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C810_b_cord_xeroderma_adult_plasma_splenic_hairy



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr12:104319130..104319137,+ p@chr12:104319130..104319137
+
Hg19::chr14:75982215..75982255,+ p@chr14:75982215..75982255
+
Hg19::chr19:36204309..36204335,+ p1@ZBTB32
Hg19::chr19:6592539..6592560,- -
p@chr19:6592539..6592560
Hg19::chr6:149353782..149353788,- p5@ENST00000433442
Hg19::chr6:149353827..149353847,- p2@ENST00000433442
Hg19::chr6:149353899..149353911,- p4@ENST00000433442
Hg19::chr6:149373615..149373627,+ p@chr6:149373615..149373627
+
Hg19::chr9:137283392..137283414,+ p@chr9:137283392..137283414
+
Hg19::chr9:137284044..137284078,+ p@chr9:137284044..137284078
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset
data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset
data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset

cell_data
uberon_data
disease_data


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system1.61e-13102
blood island1.61e-13102
hemolymphoid system7.10e-13112
blood5.26e-0815
haemolymphatic fluid5.26e-0815
organism substance5.26e-0815
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
lymphoma3.51e-0710


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs
data

Jaspar motifs
data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.
Analyst:NA

link to data source
data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.