Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1007

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 10:15, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Mm9::chr10:114822007..114822077,+ p1@Zfc3h1
Mm9::chr14:55512970..55512990,+ p1@Pabpn1
Mm9::chr15:54903694..54903716,- p1@Taf2
Mm9::chr15:98956944..98957047,+ p1@Spats2
Mm9::chr15:98957167..98957201,+ p2@Spats2
Mm9::chr16:31663927..31663998,+ p1@Dlg1
Mm9::chr3:88968712..88968785,+ p1@Clk2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset
data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0048638regulation of developmental growth0.0183531474278201
GO:0048639positive regulation of developmental growth0.0183531474278201



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median
Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset






TFBS overrepresentationSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs
data

Jaspar motifs
data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}