Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1030

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:17, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr10:59677247..59677260,-p@chr10:59677247..59677260
-
Mm9::chr12:114658205..114658217,-p@chr12:114658205..114658217
-
Mm9::chr16:19232696..19232701,+p@chr16:19232696..19232701
+
Mm9::chr4:44539145..44539157,-p@chr4:44539145..44539157
-
Mm9::chr4:44539296..44539308,-p@chr4:44539296..44539308
-
Mm9::chr4:44653387..44653399,-p@chr4:44653387..44653399
-
Mm9::chr4:44653454..44653460,-p@chr4:44653454..44653460
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
megakaryocyte progenitor cell1.80e-086
megakaryocyte1.80e-086

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
spleen6.78e-096
cavity lining6.78e-096
serous membrane6.78e-096
gastrointestinal system mesentery6.78e-096
stomach region6.78e-096
mesentery6.78e-096
gastrointestinal system serosa6.78e-096
mesentery of stomach6.78e-096
gut mesentery6.78e-096
dorsal mesentery6.78e-096
dorsal mesogastrium6.78e-096
peritoneal cavity6.78e-096
spleen primordium6.78e-096
hemolymphoid system1.93e-0848
immune system1.93e-0848
intraembryonic coelom4.29e-0710
hematopoietic system5.73e-0745
blood island5.73e-0745
foregut8.35e-0780


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}