Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1204

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1204_CD14_Neutrophils_Eosinophils_CD14CD16_Peripheral_lung_vagina



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr14:75611708..75611715,-p@chr14:75611708..75611715
-
Hg19::chr14:75611759..75611780,-p@chr14:75611759..75611780
-
Hg19::chr14:75611784..75611796,-p@chr14:75611784..75611796
-
Hg19::chr16:81481191..81481211,-p@chr16:81481191..81481211
-
Hg19::chr2:99122145..99122158,+p@chr2:99122145..99122158
+
Hg19::chr8:48647872..48647894,-p1@U00948
Hg19::chr8:48648026..48648045,+p@chr8:48648026..48648045
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
myeloid leukocyte8.32e-6372
classical monocyte2.22e-5942
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte2.22e-5942
defensive cell4.48e-5148
phagocyte4.48e-5148
leukocyte3.10e-46136
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor4.13e-4461
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.70e-4267
monopoietic cell1.71e-4259
monocyte1.71e-4259
monoblast1.71e-4259
promonocyte1.71e-4259
myeloid cell1.68e-41108
common myeloid progenitor1.68e-41108
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell3.64e-4066
hematopoietic stem cell1.49e-35168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.49e-35168
intermediate monocyte4.50e-349
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte4.50e-349
hematopoietic cell3.05e-33177
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.48e-31161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.48e-31161
nongranular leukocyte2.53e-31115
granulocyte2.44e-308
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell2.08e-27120
stuff accumulating cell4.80e-2587
blood cell1.12e-2111
neutrophil8.79e-133
single nucleate cell1.15e-123
mononuclear cell1.15e-123
non-classical monocyte1.51e-123
CD14-low, CD16-positive monocyte1.51e-123
basophil7.94e-123
mesenchymal cell1.38e-11354
connective tissue cell3.62e-11361
motile cell1.08e-09386
eosinophil3.18e-092
stem cell5.83e-08441
multi fate stem cell6.80e-08427
somatic stem cell1.20e-07433
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
bone marrow1.24e-3676
hematopoietic system1.26e-3398
blood island1.26e-3398
bone element1.98e-3382
hemolymphoid system8.33e-32108
immune system9.61e-3193
skeletal element8.03e-3090
skeletal system4.06e-26100
musculoskeletal system9.36e-13167
lateral plate mesoderm3.68e-12203
connective tissue1.35e-10371
meninx6.99e-082
membrane organ6.99e-082
meningeal cluster6.99e-082


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.0137961
MA0004.10.502801
MA0006.10.341337
MA0007.12.10741
MA0009.10.973289
MA0014.10.187674
MA0017.10.991615
MA0019.10.652951
MA0024.10.867125
MA0025.11.10816
MA0027.12.59001
MA0028.10.35747
MA0029.10.886702
MA0030.10.875089
MA0031.10.809638
MA0038.10.60704
MA0040.10.892629
MA0041.10.521615
MA0042.10.48922
MA0043.10.973609
MA0046.10.962263
MA0048.10.120314
MA0050.10.490116
MA0051.10.602745
MA0052.10.896548
MA0055.10.158296
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.115382
MA0058.10.406232
MA0059.10.404929
MA0060.10.224688
MA0061.11.09187
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.607474
MA0067.11.29359
MA0068.12.88764
MA0069.10.958358
MA0070.10.947018
MA0071.10.567661
MA0072.10.942461
MA0073.10.672652
MA0074.10.60198
MA0076.10.422297
MA0077.10.934645
MA0078.10.703614
MA0081.10.405093
MA0083.10.980893
MA0084.11.48179
MA0087.10.939982
MA0088.11.37625
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.436918
MA0091.10.505453
MA0092.10.467172
MA0093.10.344385
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.621149
MA0101.11.64331
MA0103.10.332048
MA0105.11.14871
MA0106.10.648997
MA0107.12.94961
MA0108.20.806528
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.45062
MA0113.11.59862
MA0114.11.36091
MA0115.11.21667
MA0116.10.277571
MA0117.11.01134
MA0119.10.388712
MA0122.11.03753
MA0124.11.17486
MA0125.11.0901
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.722072
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.00402
MA0136.11.491
MA0139.10.547495
MA0140.10.564957
MA0141.12.74758
MA0142.10.777365
MA0143.10.66587
MA0144.10.254954
MA0145.10.0807715
MA0146.10.0610556
MA0147.10.281049
MA0148.11.30922
MA0149.10.555119
MA0062.20.193221
MA0035.20.564239
MA0039.20.0553061
MA0138.20.704862
MA0002.20.213296
MA0137.20.36398
MA0104.20.223944
MA0047.20.636643
MA0112.20.262665
MA0065.22.03906
MA0150.10.430951
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.571637
MA0153.11.07307
MA0154.10.102476
MA0155.10.071478
MA0156.10.959643
MA0157.10.749547
MA0158.10
MA0159.12.15752
MA0160.11.34201
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.106355
MA0163.10.382702
MA0164.10.678332
MA0080.21.63199
MA0018.20.650405
MA0099.20.572
MA0079.20.07638
MA0102.21.51913
MA0258.10.245543
MA0259.10.289405
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.