Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1513


Revision as of 02:23, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

Full id: C1513_Smooth_Neutrophils_Eosinophils_Pancreatic_Mesenchymal_Skeletal_mesenchymal

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr3:154797454..154797484,+ p2@MME
Hg19::chr3:154797486..154797518,+ p10@MME
Hg19::chr3:154798079..154798088,+ p16@MME
Hg19::chr3:154798096..154798115,+ p3@MME
Hg19::chr3:154798129..154798155,+ p5@MME
Hg19::chr3:154798162..154798173,+ p13@MME

Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
presomitic mesoderm1.68e-1471
presumptive segmental plate1.68e-1471
trunk paraxial mesoderm1.68e-1471
dense mesenchyme tissue3.10e-1473
paraxial mesoderm7.06e-1472
presumptive paraxial mesoderm7.06e-1472
multilaminar epithelium1.30e-1283
muscle tissue1.04e-1164
musculature of body1.04e-1164
skeletal muscle tissue1.81e-1162
striated muscle tissue1.81e-1162
surface structure4.56e-1199
epithelial vesicle1.32e-1078
trunk mesenchyme2.62e-09122
organism subdivision4.72e-09264
entire embryonic mesenchyme4.76e-09160
integumental system1.48e-0846
skin of body3.60e-0741

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs

Jaspar motifs

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)


Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.

link to data source

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.