Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1541

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 11:25, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1541_amniotic_Amniotic_MCF7_Placental_chorionic_oral_acantholytic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr8:102504507..102504532,-p@chr8:102504507..102504532
-
Hg19::chr8:102504651..102504683,+p1@GRHL2
Hg19::chr8:102504690..102504704,+p3@GRHL2
Hg19::chr8:102504932..102504952,+p4@GRHL2
Hg19::chr8:102504979..102505010,+p2@GRHL2
Hg19::chr8:102681493..102681497,+p@chr8:102681493..102681497
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
endoderm-derived structure3.87e-24160
endoderm3.87e-24160
presumptive endoderm3.87e-24160
digestive system2.60e-17145
digestive tract2.60e-17145
primitive gut2.60e-17145
subdivision of digestive tract2.26e-14118
extraembryonic membrane1.13e-1314
membranous layer1.13e-1314
respiratory system2.57e-1374
anatomical space5.09e-1295
epithelial bud1.40e-1037
endo-epithelium1.81e-1082
reproductive structure2.76e-1059
reproductive system2.76e-1059
chorion3.21e-107
respiratory tract4.50e-1054
thoracic cavity element5.06e-1034
thoracic cavity5.06e-1034
orifice1.08e-0936
thoracic segment organ1.47e-0935
immaterial anatomical entity1.75e-09117
reproductive organ3.31e-0948
renal system4.74e-0948
epithelial fold8.83e-0947
thoracic segment of trunk9.35e-0952
urinary system structure1.55e-0847
internal genitalia2.57e-0825
mucosa6.70e-0820
male organism9.91e-0822
male reproductive system9.91e-0822
male reproductive organ1.00e-0711
extraembryonic structure1.53e-0724
lung1.60e-0722
respiratory tube1.60e-0722
respiration organ1.60e-0722
pair of lungs1.60e-0722
lung primordium1.60e-0722
lung bud1.60e-0722
foregut1.71e-0787
oral opening4.95e-0722
neck7.12e-0710
organ7.83e-07503
trunk region element9.82e-07101
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
carcinoma2.36e-17106
squamous cell carcinoma7.24e-1714
cell type cancer3.18e-11143
adenocarcinoma2.25e-1025


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186954.089491012399440.001749817597761990.010761347314372
FOXA1#316959.234516457821213.31890114386024e-050.000660108010976233
GATA3#2625418.15767757147072.56597141799789e-050.000554954418977597
MYC#460954.35190155967450.001297956345724110.00869737346279229
NR3C1#290837.486511665586520.00510866965984070.0237584873582448
ZEB1#6935411.25895467836260.0001672700379805450.00204896968058294



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.