Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1616

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 17:29, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1616_Fibroblast_Small_large_Smooth_liposarcoma_Myoblast_schwannoma



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:122051099..122051122,-p1@ENST00000533109
Hg19::chr7:130596956..130596976,-p@chr7:130596956..130596976
-
Hg19::chr7:130596992..130597040,-p@chr7:130596992..130597040
-
Hg19::chrX:45630639..45630663,-p@chrX:45630639..45630663
-
Hg19::chrX:45630665..45630670,-p@chrX:45630665..45630670
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
somite1.89e-2083
paraxial mesoderm1.89e-2083
presomitic mesoderm1.89e-2083
presumptive segmental plate1.89e-2083
trunk paraxial mesoderm1.89e-2083
presumptive paraxial mesoderm1.89e-2083
multilaminar epithelium2.67e-1882
dermomyotome2.57e-1770
vasculature2.89e-1779
vascular system2.89e-1779
anatomical system1.22e-15625
anatomical group2.55e-15626
trunk mesenchyme3.65e-15143
multi-cellular organism6.59e-15659
artery8.44e-1542
arterial blood vessel8.44e-1542
arterial system8.44e-1542
vessel1.03e-1469
blood vessel1.65e-1460
epithelial tube open at both ends1.65e-1460
blood vasculature1.65e-1460
vascular cord1.65e-1460
organism subdivision2.03e-14365
unilaminar epithelium6.43e-14138
skeletal muscle tissue7.33e-1461
striated muscle tissue7.33e-1461
myotome7.33e-1461
surface structure8.54e-1495
muscle tissue2.86e-1363
musculature2.86e-1363
musculature of body2.86e-1363
trunk4.22e-13216
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.12e-1284
systemic artery1.82e-1233
systemic arterial system1.82e-1233
cell layer2.46e-12312
epithelium8.55e-12309
skin of body7.85e-1140
integument1.08e-1045
integumental system1.08e-1045
epithelial tube1.10e-10118
cardiovascular system1.33e-09110
germ layer5.29e-09604
embryonic tissue5.29e-09604
presumptive structure5.29e-09604
epiblast (generic)5.29e-09604
mesoderm5.85e-09448
mesoderm-derived structure5.85e-09448
presumptive mesoderm5.85e-09448
aorta5.93e-0921
aortic system5.93e-0921
embryonic structure6.62e-09605
developing anatomical structure6.62e-09605
circulatory system1.55e-08113
mesenchyme8.18e-08238
entire embryonic mesenchyme8.18e-08238
embryo1.14e-07612
multi-tissue structure3.45e-07347
anatomical cluster3.66e-07286
simple squamous epithelium3.79e-0722


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.