Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2102

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:17, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2102_amniotic_cervical_Placental_chorionic_Hep2_salivary_Corneal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:119994643..119994655,-p10@TRIM29
Hg19::chr11:119999506..119999529,-p7@TRIM29
Hg19::chr11:119999539..119999579,-p3@TRIM29
Hg19::chr11:119999611..119999625,-p9@TRIM29


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial cell1.92e-18253
endo-epithelial cell2.90e-1442
epithelial cell of alimentary canal4.62e-1120
endodermal cell3.81e-1058
general ecto-epithelial cell7.52e-0814
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
endoderm-derived structure9.91e-20160
endoderm9.91e-20160
presumptive endoderm9.91e-20160
respiratory system4.83e-1774
digestive system6.17e-14145
digestive tract6.17e-14145
primitive gut6.17e-14145
respiratory tract1.72e-1354
subdivision of digestive tract3.27e-12118
larynx4.26e-129
extraembryonic membrane9.40e-1214
membranous layer9.40e-1214
upper respiratory tract1.48e-1119
foregut7.63e-1187
respiratory primordium2.01e-1038
endoderm of foregut2.01e-1038
segment of respiratory tract9.37e-1047
orifice1.09e-0936
organ1.77e-09503
chorion7.09e-097
organ part1.78e-08218
oral opening1.93e-0822
surface structure8.64e-0899
organ system subdivision3.18e-07223
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
carcinoma2.73e-12106
cell type cancer2.54e-07143
squamous cell carcinoma3.14e-0714


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BRCA1#672315.13817298241780.0004682184421431190.00429968046065112
CEBPB#105135.978360719368610.007153832484726970.0297155912529293
EP300#203335.08045629466740.01144298405398240.0418670103910971
FOXA1#316938.311064812039090.002740138182109850.0150318989180255
GATA3#2625320.42738726790450.0001924415576258320.00231895740589411
JUN#372539.384621894252250.001918994502030470.0112809786557222
MAX#414934.839416631755340.01315737137836840.046589005234291
MXI1#460137.471178721569470.003741314738550960.0186190398351055
NR3C1#2908311.22976749837980.001131672068063850.00775173470955079
RFX5#599339.035933120396320.002144561191324070.0123798267886743
SMARCB1#6598313.68953683586810.0006305783409379340.00517947081000526
SMC3#9126311.28369963369960.001115802366868050.00765407444291184
STAT1#6772315.52994062289940.000434088655175550.00404747656975977
STAT3#677437.889598747865680.003190760481680130.0167381502810885
TFAP2A#7020416.5186343730451.34240829060362e-050.000325970191728322
TFAP2C#7022410.80922860986027.32289634782688e-050.0011437056552575



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.