Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2153

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.


Full id: C2153_Eosinophils_Natural_Peripheral_CD34_Basophils_CD8_Dendritic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:65333490..65333496,-p@chr11:65333490..65333496
-
Hg19::chr17:34400098..34400106,+p@chr17:34400098..34400106
+
Hg19::chr1:182584314..182584339,+p3@LOC284648
Hg19::chr3:4876148..4876156,-p@chr3:4876148..4876156
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br><br><br>

Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte1.06e-23136
hematopoietic stem cell1.02e-22168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.02e-22168
hematopoietic cell3.21e-21177
nongranular leukocyte6.39e-17115
natural killer cell2.20e-163
pro-NK cell2.20e-163
basophil8.92e-163
single nucleate cell2.06e-153
mononuclear cell2.06e-153
plasmacytoid dendritic cell2.38e-153
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.91e-14161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.91e-14161
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell4.48e-1352
CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell5.79e-136
lymphocyte8.91e-1353
common lymphoid progenitor8.91e-1353
mature alpha-beta T cell2.05e-1218
alpha-beta T cell2.05e-1218
immature T cell2.05e-1218
mature T cell2.05e-1218
immature alpha-beta T cell2.05e-1218
nucleate cell3.27e-1255
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.72e-11120
granulocyte2.24e-108
T cell1.13e-0825
pro-T cell1.13e-0825
circulating cell6.19e-086
blood cell1.49e-0711
mesenchymal cell3.35e-07354
connective tissue cell6.24e-07361


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.443649
MA0004.10.71247
MA0006.10.532262
MA0007.10.6918
MA0009.11.20602
MA0014.10.244769
MA0017.10.577281
MA0019.10.873355
MA0024.11.09684
MA0025.11.34373
MA0027.12.83281
MA0028.10.550763
MA0029.11.11704
MA0030.11.10506
MA0031.11.03735
MA0038.10.824639
MA0040.11.12314
MA0041.10.732902
MA0042.10.697662
MA0043.11.20635
MA0046.11.19471
MA0048.10.709734
MA0050.10.69864
MA0051.10.820063
MA0052.11.12718
MA0055.10.396851
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.248209
MA0058.10.605914
MA0059.10.604454
MA0060.10.393285
MA0061.10.360128
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.825101
MA0067.11.53181
MA0068.10.313194
MA0069.11.19071
MA0070.11.17908
MA0071.10.782546
MA0072.11.1744
MA0073.10.0343867
MA0074.10.819248
MA0076.10.623864
MA0077.11.16637
MA0078.10.926725
MA0081.10.604638
MA0083.11.21381
MA0084.11.72172
MA0087.11.17185
MA0088.10.182167
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.640115
MA0091.10.715356
MA0092.10.673508
MA0093.10.535768
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.83965
MA0101.10.539569
MA0103.10.521546
MA0105.10.232357
MA0106.10.869173
MA0107.11.1497
MA0108.21.03412
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.655276
MA0113.10.886811
MA0114.10.447443
MA0115.11.45393
MA0116.10.457606
MA0117.11.24497
MA0119.10.586221
MA0122.11.27173
MA0124.11.41151
MA0125.11.32534
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.94608
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.23748
MA0136.10.832277
MA0139.10.912459
MA0140.10.779643
MA0141.11.46638
MA0142.11.00381
MA0143.10.887001
MA0144.10.430413
MA0145.10.569905
MA0146.10.481
MA0147.10.46175
MA0148.10.739888
MA0149.10.769072
MA0062.21.66396
MA0035.20.778873
MA0039.20.0247757
MA0138.20.928035
MA0002.20.98779
MA0137.20.558189
MA0104.20.392359
MA0047.20.856092
MA0112.20.187982
MA0065.20.577908
MA0150.10.633493
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.78681
MA0153.11.30799
MA0154.10.229241
MA0155.10.180766
MA0156.10.560797
MA0157.10.97481
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.462502
MA0160.10.756582
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.309472
MA0163.10.0725493
MA0164.10.90014
MA0080.21.32578
MA0018.20.870662
MA0099.20.7872
MA0079.20.0626799
MA0102.21.75932
MA0258.10.418966
MA0259.10.471671
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BATF#10538318.26835134422770.0002681660105721290.0028660448197035
BCL11A#53335321.27709132770530.0001704839114606140.00208077237688852
EBF1#187936.679850134926750.005184294118278910.0240342015899739
IRF4#3662210.95725634337210.01174530180688030.0428186112611273
MEF2A#4205314.0574231822330.0005830038854186610.00488592062182952
MEF2C#4208330.9835158694685.56692972943475e-050.000940784100343747
PAX5#507935.002174148383370.01196533174786410.0434765780334403
TCF12#693837.975848676639820.003090920396013070.0162716182891884
ZNF263#1012736.166381227758010.006539814347975980.0279579071096301



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.

Retrieved from "http://f5-webapp4.gsc.riken.jp/resource_browser/index.php?title=Coexpression_cluster:C2153&oldid=3069270"