Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2353

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 15:26, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2353_Mast_immature_Natural_CD8_CD4_CD14_Basophils



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr15:86126091..86126118,+p7@AKAP13
Hg19::chr15:86127368..86127397,+p@chr15:86127368..86127397
+
Hg19::chr1:204381318..204381339,+p@chr1:204381318..204381339
+
Hg19::chr9:75747095..75747116,+p@chr9:75747095..75747116
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte5.26e-46136
classical monocyte7.37e-3942
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte7.37e-3942
hematopoietic stem cell1.33e-36168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.33e-36168
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell2.48e-35120
hematopoietic cell2.53e-35177
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell4.13e-32161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell4.13e-32161
nongranular leukocyte4.41e-32115
defensive cell4.75e-3248
phagocyte4.75e-3248
myeloid leukocyte5.15e-3272
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell6.69e-2967
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.63e-2766
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor3.40e-2661
myeloid cell2.32e-24108
common myeloid progenitor2.32e-24108
monopoietic cell3.46e-2459
monocyte3.46e-2459
monoblast3.46e-2459
promonocyte3.46e-2459
stuff accumulating cell9.71e-1687
mesenchymal cell9.23e-14354
connective tissue cell6.88e-13361
motile cell6.64e-10386
stem cell5.04e-09441
multi fate stem cell6.25e-09427
intermediate monocyte1.85e-089
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte1.85e-089
somatic stem cell2.13e-08433
CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell4.79e-086
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell7.99e-0852
mature alpha-beta T cell8.24e-0818
alpha-beta T cell8.24e-0818
immature T cell8.24e-0818
mature T cell8.24e-0818
immature alpha-beta T cell8.24e-0818
nucleate cell1.05e-0755
lymphocyte1.53e-0753
common lymphoid progenitor1.53e-0753
Langerhans cell7.79e-075
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system5.09e-2598
blood island5.09e-2598
bone marrow6.62e-2576
hemolymphoid system7.57e-25108
bone element8.85e-2482
immune system2.87e-2393
skeletal element3.72e-2090
skeletal system3.63e-18100
connective tissue3.28e-12371
lateral plate mesoderm8.05e-12203


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BATF#10538212.17890089615180.009566758805047810.036014227835504
CEBPB#105135.978360719368610.007153832484726970.0297226841258862
FOS#235336.74846648167080.005032452776317940.0234625389717365
JUN#372539.384621894252250.001918994502030470.0112835191305912
PBX3#5090210.95725634337210.01174530180688030.0428320673001423
POU5F1#5460183.85980036297640.01187154239091560.0432380825026969
SPI1#668836.153242631392040.006580387113059030.0280980027679289



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.