Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2769

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:19, 5 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2769_CD14_amniotic_chorionic_immature_Mast_Smooth_granulosa



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr4:108745993..108746041,+p5@SGMS2
Hg19::chr4:108746054..108746072,+p6@SGMS2
Hg19::chr4:108746081..108746096,+p3@SGMS2
Hg19::chr4:108746105..108746178,+p1@SGMS2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
mesoderm1.26e-25448
mesoderm-derived structure1.26e-25448
presumptive mesoderm1.26e-25448
anatomical group1.57e-20626
anatomical system2.24e-20625
multi-cellular organism5.31e-19659
musculoskeletal system1.91e-18167
organ1.37e-15511
germ layer4.42e-15604
embryonic tissue4.42e-15604
presumptive structure4.42e-15604
epiblast (generic)4.42e-15604
embryonic structure4.46e-15605
developing anatomical structure4.46e-15605
skeletal element6.21e-14101
skeletal system6.21e-14101
embryo9.24e-14612
bone element4.61e-1286
bone marrow2.98e-1180
lateral plate mesoderm2.26e-10216


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CEBPB#105147.971147625824820.0002476385788090830.00268428910557777
CTCF#1066445.360256373075030.001211145381643620.00818975801317438
E2F1#186944.907389214879320.001724022357361790.0106699360581042
EGR1#195844.988179094810140.001615011500076050.0101596305298424
EP300#203346.77394172622320.0004748459821442640.00434945093221933
FOS#235348.99795530889440.0001525147711168630.00195226010303641
FOSL2#2355416.93020060456171.2165416097647e-050.000304176177118065
FOXA1#3169411.08141974938556.62943068949433e-050.00107244596000635
GATA2#262439.55869880016550.001818151618357440.010905463868001
GATA3#2625427.2365163572061.81561517799785e-066.78186815360934e-05
JUN#3725412.51282919233634.07770316866756e-050.00074453014201481
JUND#372746.994663941871030.000417684217818580.00392218324265012
MYC#460945.22228187160940.001344309395272740.00889047169027921
TAF1#687243.343046285745290.008005664898701650.032298205135995
TBP#690843.706770687096390.005296377814784350.0244810091877965



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.