Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2827

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 03:13, 17 September 2013 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2827_Pericytes_Osteoblast_Smooth_astrocytoma_Fibroblast_transitionalcell_alveolar



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr5:72743793..72743855,- p4@FOXD1
Hg19::chr5:72744445..72744466,- p2@FOXD1
Hg19::chr5:72744562..72744573,- p3@FOXD1
Hg19::chr5:72744594..72744609,- p1@FOXD1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset
data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset
data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset

cell_data
uberon_data


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
organism subdivision6.76e-20264
surface structure2.05e-1599
epithelial vesicle2.71e-1478
trunk3.70e-14199
multilaminar epithelium1.41e-1383
integument1.89e-1346
integumental system1.89e-1346
dense mesenchyme tissue1.97e-1373
somite4.22e-1371
presomitic mesoderm4.22e-1371
presumptive segmental plate4.22e-1371
dermomyotome4.22e-1371
trunk paraxial mesoderm4.22e-1371
paraxial mesoderm5.12e-1372
presumptive paraxial mesoderm5.12e-1372
skin of body6.74e-1341
mesenchyme9.87e-13160
entire embryonic mesenchyme9.87e-13160
trunk mesenchyme4.14e-11122
skeletal muscle tissue2.26e-1062
striated muscle tissue2.26e-1062
myotome2.26e-1062
multi-tissue structure2.37e-10342
muscle tissue7.85e-1064
musculature7.85e-1064
musculature of body7.85e-1064
multi-cellular organism2.84e-08656
cell layer3.40e-08309
artery1.11e-0742
arterial blood vessel1.11e-0742
arterial system1.11e-0742
epithelium2.02e-07306
anatomical group2.33e-07625
head2.72e-0756
anatomical system3.32e-07624
systemic artery6.88e-0733
systemic arterial system6.88e-0733
blood vessel smooth muscle9.17e-0710
arterial system smooth muscle9.17e-0710
artery smooth muscle tissue9.17e-0710
aorta smooth muscle tissue9.17e-0710


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs
data

Jaspar motifs
data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.11.05935
MA0004.10.71247
MA0006.10.532262
MA0007.10.6918
MA0009.11.20602
MA0014.10.524262
MA0017.10.577281
MA0019.10.873355
MA0024.11.09684
MA0025.11.34373
MA0027.12.83281
MA0028.10.550763
MA0029.11.11704
MA0030.11.10506
MA0031.11.03735
MA0038.10.824639
MA0040.11.12314
MA0041.10.732902
MA0042.10.697662
MA0043.11.20635
MA0046.11.19471
MA0048.11.30988
MA0050.10.69864
MA0051.10.820063
MA0052.11.12718
MA0055.10.791759
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.69331
MA0058.10.605914
MA0059.10.604454
MA0060.10.393285
MA0061.10.360128
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.825101
MA0067.11.53181
MA0068.10.313194
MA0069.11.19071
MA0070.11.17908
MA0071.10.782546
MA0072.11.1744
MA0073.10.0343867
MA0074.10.819248
MA0076.10.623864
MA0077.11.16637
MA0078.10.926725
MA0081.10.604638
MA0083.11.21381
MA0084.11.72172
MA0087.11.17185
MA0088.10.182167
MA0089.10
MA0090.13.80961
MA0091.10.715356
MA0092.10.673508
MA0093.10.535768
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.83965
MA0101.10.539569
MA0103.10.521546
MA0105.10.656404
MA0106.10.869173
MA0107.10.453492
MA0108.21.03412
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.655276
MA0113.10.886811
MA0114.11.13665
MA0115.11.45393
MA0116.10.457606
MA0117.12.78257
MA0119.10.586221
MA0122.11.27173
MA0124.11.41151
MA0125.11.32534
MA0130.10
MA0131.13.57792
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.23748
MA0136.10.832277
MA0139.12.47057
MA0140.10.779643
MA0141.10.602484
MA0142.11.00381
MA0143.10.887001
MA0144.10.430413
MA0145.10.195821
MA0146.11.75643
MA0147.10.46175
MA0148.10.739888
MA0149.10.769072
MA0062.20.353589
MA0035.20.778873
MA0039.20.0247757
MA0138.20.928035
MA0002.20.379056
MA0137.20.558189
MA0104.20.392359
MA0047.20.856092
MA0112.20.187982
MA0065.20.577908
MA0150.10.633493
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.78681
MA0153.11.30799
MA0154.10.229241
MA0155.10.180766
MA0156.10.560797
MA0157.10.97481
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.462502
MA0160.10.756582
MA0161.10
MA0162.12.15942
MA0163.11.37853
MA0164.10.90014
MA0080.20.535868
MA0018.20.870662
MA0099.20.7872
MA0079.22.72671
MA0102.21.75932
MA0258.10.418966
MA0259.10.471671
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186944.907389214879320.001724022357361790.0106756297272921
MAX#414934.839416631755340.01315737137836840.0466427721185775
TCF7L2#693438.077632422353010.002978381685834620.0158695579249468
USF1#739134.771124457905970.01370465887188020.0483318993692271
USF2#739239.74414803880220.001718341848410070.010725669633403
ZNF263#1012748.221841637010680.0002187871180958320.00249780365400203



Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.
Analyst:NA

link to data source
data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.