Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2876

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:41, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2876_squamous_gastric_pharyngeal_renal_signet_papillotubular_gall



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr7:116312352..116312368,+p6@MET
Hg19::chr7:116312411..116312502,+p1@MET
Hg19::chr7:116312521..116312532,+p4@MET
Hg19::chr7:116312540..116312549,+p14@MET


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial cell5.07e-43254
embryonic cell7.18e-19248
endo-epithelial cell5.90e-1343
endodermal cell1.08e-1259
squamous epithelial cell1.40e-1162
columnar/cuboidal epithelial cell4.33e-0727
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
anatomical system5.56e-17625
anatomical group1.02e-16626
multi-cellular organism4.36e-14659
endoderm-derived structure4.68e-13169
endoderm4.68e-13169
presumptive endoderm4.68e-13169
organ4.84e-11511
mesenchyme5.78e-11238
entire embryonic mesenchyme5.78e-11238
multi-tissue structure2.45e-10347
embryonic structure3.80e-10605
developing anatomical structure3.80e-10605
germ layer4.06e-10604
embryonic tissue4.06e-10604
presumptive structure4.06e-10604
epiblast (generic)4.06e-10604
digestive system7.87e-10155
digestive tract7.87e-10155
primitive gut7.87e-10155
epithelium9.20e-10309
embryo1.42e-09612
mixed endoderm/mesoderm-derived structure2.76e-09130
organism subdivision3.14e-09365
cell layer3.67e-09312
respiratory primordium3.02e-0838
endoderm of foregut3.02e-0838
endo-epithelium3.76e-0882
subdivision of digestive tract7.59e-08129
endodermal part of digestive tract7.59e-08129
respiratory system1.67e-0772
trunk4.10e-07216
unilaminar epithelium4.67e-07138
respiratory tract5.85e-0753
organ part7.82e-07219
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
carcinoma9.45e-14106
cell type cancer3.33e-12143


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.