Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3316: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|full_id=C3316_Amniotic_seminal_ductal_ductus_lung_tubular_Placental

Latest revision as of 12:23, 17 September 2013


Full id: C3316_Amniotic_seminal_ductal_ductus_lung_tubular_Placental



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr12:6484190..6484221,-p7@SCNN1A
Hg19::chr12:6484243..6484261,-p10@SCNN1A
Hg19::chr12:6484306..6484392,+p4@LTBR


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
endoderm-derived structure1.88e-20160
endoderm1.88e-20160
presumptive endoderm1.88e-20160
urinary system structure2.54e-1847
trunk region element8.58e-18101
renal system1.06e-1748
subdivision of digestive tract6.48e-17118
digestive system2.50e-14145
digestive tract2.50e-14145
primitive gut2.50e-14145
immaterial anatomical entity3.57e-14117
anatomical space1.32e-1395
endo-epithelium4.44e-1282
foregut1.85e-1187
epithelial bud7.26e-1137
kidney2.20e-1026
kidney mesenchyme2.20e-1026
upper urinary tract2.20e-1026
kidney rudiment2.20e-1026
kidney field2.20e-1026
subdivision of trunk2.92e-10112
thoracic cavity element3.57e-1034
thoracic cavity3.57e-1034
organ3.71e-10503
nephron tubule epithelium4.22e-1010
cavitated compound organ4.90e-1031
thoracic segment organ1.07e-0935
respiratory tract7.11e-0954
lung8.44e-0922
respiratory tube8.44e-0922
respiration organ8.44e-0922
pair of lungs8.44e-0922
lung primordium8.44e-0922
lung bud8.44e-0922
multi-cellular organism1.53e-08656
organ system subdivision1.69e-08223
embryo2.44e-08592
excretory tube3.37e-0816
kidney epithelium3.37e-0816
respiratory system3.92e-0874
multi-tissue structure4.41e-08342
organ segment5.82e-0898
epithelial fold7.22e-0847
organism subdivision1.28e-07264
abdomen element1.64e-0754
abdominal segment element1.64e-0754
nephron epithelium2.15e-0715
renal tubule2.15e-0715
nephron tubule2.15e-0715
nephron2.15e-0715
uriniferous tubule2.15e-0715
nephrogenic mesenchyme2.15e-0715
primordium2.59e-07160
reproductive structure2.76e-0759
reproductive system2.76e-0759
extraembryonic membrane2.83e-0714
membranous layer2.83e-0714
respiratory primordium3.27e-0738
endoderm of foregut3.27e-0738
anatomical cluster5.13e-07373
male reproductive organ5.19e-0711
organ part8.67e-07218
transitional epithelium9.53e-076
male organism9.77e-0722
male reproductive system9.77e-0722
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
carcinoma1.66e-11106
cell type cancer3.59e-08143


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.178364
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.10.118426
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.10.658629
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.904546
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.11.06172
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.333427
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.10.456531
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.11.04561
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.10.0185922
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.11.31954
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.10.31555
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.10.560723
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.11.31729
MA0145.10.273764
MA0146.10.107247
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.20.0526989
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.20.476938
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.20.491226
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.21.34467
MA0065.20.760954
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.312019
MA0155.12.02721
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.149099
MA0163.10.387745
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.20.69213
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
ESR1#2099220.51240219743630.003099741577095180.0163040849400807



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.