Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3443

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 12:23, 22 January 2013 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3443_amygdala_putamen_caudate_Dendritic_medulloblastoma_occipital_medial



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr14:64932162..64932175,+ p4@AKAP5
Hg19::chr14:64932186..64932205,+ p2@AKAP5
Hg19::chr14:64932210..64932226,+ p1@AKAP5


Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset
data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset
data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset

cell_data
uberon_data


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
neural cell2.05e-0725
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
central nervous system4.79e-3181
nervous system2.32e-2989
brain1.60e-2568
future brain1.60e-2568
cerebral hemisphere1.45e-2432
regional part of forebrain2.51e-2441
forebrain2.51e-2441
anterior neural tube2.51e-2441
future forebrain2.51e-2441
telencephalon3.35e-2334
brain grey matter9.04e-2334
gray matter9.04e-2334
regional part of telencephalon1.49e-2232
regional part of nervous system4.16e-2153
regional part of brain4.16e-2153
neural tube9.25e-2156
neural rod9.25e-2156
future spinal cord9.25e-2156
neural keel9.25e-2156
cerebral cortex5.19e-1925
pallium5.19e-1925
organ system subdivision2.16e-18223
pre-chordal neural plate3.68e-1861
regional part of cerebral cortex1.86e-1722
neurectoderm4.67e-1686
neocortex7.08e-1620
neural plate3.34e-1582
presumptive neural plate3.34e-1582
adult organism3.33e-13114
ectoderm-derived structure1.21e-12171
ectoderm1.21e-12171
presumptive ectoderm1.21e-12171
ecto-epithelium9.02e-10104
anatomical cluster5.98e-08373
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest6.92e-08132
basal ganglion9.87e-079
nuclear complex of neuraxis9.87e-079
aggregate regional part of brain9.87e-079
collection of basal ganglia9.87e-079
cerebral subcortex9.87e-079


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs
data

Jaspar motifs
data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.14.57391
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.11.88666
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.16.45108
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.11.58389
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.341392
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.11.67416
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.886807
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.11.23283
MA0061.11.15625
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.10.405474
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.11.79391
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.10.257905
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.13.07926
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.11.5295
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.11.36919
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.10.560723
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.11.96087
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.10.273764
MA0146.10.348055
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.22.74132
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.20.476938
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.20.491226
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.22.07067
MA0065.20.277623
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.11.51687
MA0155.11.31345
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.8915
MA0163.10.122425
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.210.17
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.11.29138
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.0278903905005649
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0324396787327582
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.0321294816262196
EBF1#187938.9064668465690.00141523283560980.00913733321700373
NFYB#4801316.75979325353650.0002123649923296180.00245317856806913
PBX3#5090321.91451268674419.49854535978121e-050.00136397439685163
ZBTB7A#5134137.35190930787590.002516255860282270.0139851655469118



Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.
Analyst:NA

link to data source
data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.