Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3503


Revision as of 05:37, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

Full id: C3503_osteoclastoma_acute_small_hepatoblastoma_stomach_sacrococcigeal_heart

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr15:63340604..63340622,+ p7@TPM1
Hg19::chr15:63340647..63340728,+ p2@TPM1
Hg19::chr15:63340734..63340769,+ p4@TPM1

Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism7.14e-32115
anatomical cluster6.35e-18286
multi-cellular organism3.74e-17659
multi-tissue structure1.06e-16347
anatomical conduit1.29e-16241
neural tube3.90e-1457
neural rod3.90e-1457
future spinal cord3.90e-1457
neural keel3.90e-1457
cell layer9.04e-14312
regional part of brain9.19e-1459
anatomical system1.78e-13625
anatomical group3.68e-13626
central nervous system4.98e-1382
future brain7.61e-1369
anterior neural tube1.30e-1142
regional part of nervous system1.31e-1194
nervous system1.31e-1194
embryonic structure2.19e-11605
developing anatomical structure2.19e-11605
germ layer4.17e-11604
embryonic tissue4.17e-11604
presumptive structure4.17e-11604
epiblast (generic)4.17e-11604
regional part of forebrain4.64e-1141
future forebrain4.64e-1141
neural plate8.15e-1186
presumptive neural plate8.15e-1186
subdivision of digestive tract1.13e-10129
endodermal part of digestive tract1.13e-10129
organism subdivision1.61e-10365
gray matter3.73e-1034
brain grey matter3.73e-1034
digestive system8.98e-10155
digestive tract8.98e-10155
primitive gut8.98e-10155
cerebral hemisphere1.19e-0932
regional part of telencephalon2.95e-0933
ectoderm-derived structure1.79e-08169
regional part of cerebral cortex1.90e-0822
endoderm-derived structure2.00e-08169
presumptive endoderm2.00e-08169
mixed endoderm/mesoderm-derived structure9.55e-08130
organ part2.01e-07219
presumptive ectoderm2.20e-07173
cerebral cortex2.44e-0725
entire embryonic mesenchyme9.91e-07238

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs

Jaspar motifs

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.

link to data source

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.