Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3530


Revision as of 05:37, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

Full id: C3530_Myoblast_ovary_extraskeletal_Fibroblast_kidney_breast_cervix

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr15:96873921..96873946,+ p1@NR2F2
Hg19::chr15:96873984..96873999,+ p3@NR2F2
Hg19::chr15:96874012..96874042,+ p2@NR2F2

Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
organism subdivision5.51e-19365
multi-tissue structure8.77e-19347
cell layer1.60e-18312
anatomical cluster3.02e-17286
anatomical conduit1.08e-16241
epithelial tube4.26e-15118
subdivision of trunk2.36e-14113
unilaminar epithelium2.64e-14138
entire embryonic mesenchyme7.89e-14238
multi-cellular organism2.28e-13659
immaterial anatomical entity4.72e-13126
trunk mesenchyme1.20e-12143
vascular system2.23e-1279
trunk region element6.70e-11107
body cavity precursor2.15e-1063
anatomical space2.23e-10104
abdominal segment of trunk3.40e-1061
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm5.25e-1084
compound organ7.31e-1069
anatomical cavity3.75e-0970
anatomical system2.33e-08625
abdomen element3.19e-0855
abdominal segment element3.19e-0855
anatomical group4.14e-08626
simple squamous epithelium1.12e-0722
renal system1.17e-0745
blood vessel1.63e-0760
epithelial tube open at both ends1.63e-0760
blood vasculature1.63e-0760
vascular cord1.63e-0760
blood vessel endothelium1.98e-0718
cardiovascular system endothelium1.98e-0718
cavitated compound organ2.85e-0732
urinary system structure3.03e-0744
intermediate mesoderm3.78e-0737
circulatory system4.00e-07113
squamous epithelium4.25e-0725
cardiovascular system6.26e-07110
embryonic structure9.51e-07605
developing anatomical structure9.51e-07605
body cavity9.86e-0746

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs

Jaspar motifs

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.

link to data source

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.