Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3668

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 07:16, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3668_Mallassezderived_Prostate_Urothelial_Bronchial_Gingival_Small_Esophageal



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr17:6544328..6544342,+ p2@TXNDC17
Hg19::chr17:6544356..6544363,+ p3@TXNDC17
Hg19::chr17:6544372..6544386,+ p1@TXNDC17


Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset
data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset
data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset

cell_data
uberon_data


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial vesicle1.59e-1278
multilaminar epithelium4.72e-1283
organism subdivision9.38e-12264
trunk1.08e-11199
unilaminar epithelium1.09e-10148
mesenchyme4.28e-10160
entire embryonic mesenchyme4.28e-10160
somite4.37e-1071
presomitic mesoderm4.37e-1071
presumptive segmental plate4.37e-1071
dermomyotome4.37e-1071
trunk paraxial mesoderm4.37e-1071
trunk mesenchyme5.22e-10122
epithelial tube8.84e-10117
dense mesenchyme tissue1.30e-0973
paraxial mesoderm1.64e-0972
presumptive paraxial mesoderm1.64e-0972
skeletal muscle tissue1.69e-0862
striated muscle tissue1.69e-0862
myotome1.69e-0862
muscle tissue6.23e-0864
musculature6.23e-0864
musculature of body6.23e-0864
vasculature7.22e-0878
vascular system7.22e-0878
artery4.03e-0742
arterial blood vessel4.03e-0742
arterial system4.03e-0742


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs
data

Jaspar motifs
data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CCNT2#90536.336201576962630.003930750035764890.0189863843763412
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0324981372027632
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.0321782422217299
EGR1#195834.988179094810140.008056488137383440.03203180921959
ELF1#199734.258097958807540.01295179875054610.0461757666999482
ELK4#2005316.2356816584680.0002336043955745990.00255604080350084
ETS1#211339.728760922202340.001085840092584840.00761612178841288
FOSL2#2355316.93020060456170.0002060162053171620.00242818265061721
GABPB1#255337.067683836182170.002832212825417420.0153970889216475
IRF1#365937.63716375356390.002244692747297240.0127951897082729
MAX#414936.452555509007120.003721913834265510.0186352633844794
MXI1#460139.96157162875930.001011470541259020.00719695952163449
MYC#460935.22228187160940.007020843755740150.0294206115237229
NFKB1#479035.488063424193840.006049381815655430.0269386171255378
NR3C1#2908314.9730233311730.0002978331194675480.00308646489026308
PAX5#507936.669565531177830.003370290999677260.0172789662616118
POU2F2#545239.106124057742520.001324165192682130.00881642793309505
REST#597839.650028716128020.001112636247114590.00766862119794104
SIN3A#2594235.408884726815140.006318961977991520.0276394048674229
SIX5#147912317.0867153554590.0002004060546325010.00239530875941449
SP1#666735.69838137814090.005403962701712170.0246251782627565
SPI1#668838.204323508522730.001810593189410520.0109001926509595
SREBF1#6720347.00584944048839.62099323994382e-060.000254574844942106
SRF#6722313.79717826216780.0003806615025800190.00374737549891174
STAT1#6772320.70658749719920.0001125992441046670.00154753947296319
TAF7#6879311.43306940492390.0006690181981945830.00542312881102484
TCF12#6938310.63446490218640.0008313523990202070.006288976763818
TCF7L2#6934310.77017656313730.0008003181298398380.00613058714701063
USF1#739136.361499277207960.00388404057290560.0190095746470635
YY1#752834.911170749853860.008441455341808260.032898617599937
ZBTB7A#5134137.35190930787590.002516255860282270.0140030503432631
ZNF263#1012738.221841637010680.001799043925565870.0109321201223119



Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.
Analyst:NA

link to data source
data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.