Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C427

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:46, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C427_Eosinophils_CD4_Peripheral_Neutrophils_Basophils_mature_Mast



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:105880871..105880889,+p5@SFR1
Hg19::chr11:58346375..58346390,-p@chr11:58346375..58346390
-
Hg19::chr14:35342116..35342120,-p@chr14:35342116..35342120
-
Hg19::chr15:72612817..72612837,+p@chr15:72612817..72612837
+
Hg19::chr15:73075463..73075507,+p1@LOC100287559
Hg19::chr15:93426078..93426080,+p2@LOC100507217
Hg19::chr19:12902289..12902307,+p1@JUNB
Hg19::chr19:39897943..39897995,+p@chr19:39897943..39897995
+
Hg19::chr1:45273015..45273052,-p1@TCTEX1D4
Hg19::chr22:41347007..41347050,-p@chr22:41347007..41347050
-
Hg19::chr2:100106078..100106095,+p@chr2:100106078..100106095
+
Hg19::chr2:208394817..208394834,+p3@CREB1
Hg19::chr3:196229754..196229771,+p@chr3:196229754..196229771
+
Hg19::chr3:53164571..53164592,+p@chr3:53164571..53164592
+
Hg19::chr5:172199488..172199515,-p@chr5:172199488..172199515
-
Hg19::chr6:30294186..30294251,+p1@TRIM39
Hg19::chr6:36650894..36650908,+p@chr6:36650894..36650908
+
Hg19::chr7:104654038..104654052,-p1@LOC100216545
Hg19::chr7:130792940..130792965,+p@chr7:130792940..130792965
+
Hg19::chr7:140624878..140624906,+p@chr7:140624878..140624906
+
Hg19::chr9:74980291..74980312,+p@chr9:74980291..74980312
+
Hg19::chrX:15353629..15353684,-p1@PIGA
Hg19::chrX:15693462..15693479,-p@chrX:15693462..15693479
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0003712transcription cofactor activity0.018187435853225
GO:0000506glycosylphosphatidylinositol-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase (GPI-GnT) complex0.018187435853225
GO:0046983protein dimerization activity0.018187435853225
GO:0017176phosphatidylinositol N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase activity0.018187435853225
GO:0008134transcription factor binding0.0196061772370119
GO:0006506GPI anchor biosynthetic process0.045457632223145
GO:0006505GPI anchor metabolic process0.045457632223145
GO:0043565sequence-specific DNA binding0.045457632223145
GO:0046489phosphoinositide biosynthetic process0.045457632223145
GO:0005515protein binding0.045457632223145
GO:0008375acetylglucosaminyltransferase activity0.045457632223145
GO:0046474glycerophospholipid biosynthetic process0.045457632223145
GO:0006497protein amino acid lipidation0.045457632223145
GO:0042158lipoprotein biosynthetic process0.045457632223145
GO:0019222regulation of metabolic process0.045457632223145



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte2.65e-50140
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.32e-41124
hematopoietic stem cell7.53e-41172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell7.53e-41172
nongranular leukocyte9.64e-39119
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell2.12e-37165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell2.12e-37165
hematopoietic cell2.12e-37182
myeloid leukocyte1.06e-2876
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte2.91e-2542
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell3.57e-2571
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.55e-2470
classical monocyte7.44e-2445
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.04e-2265
monopoietic cell1.28e-2163
monocyte1.28e-2163
monoblast1.28e-2163
promonocyte1.28e-2163
myeloid cell2.67e-21112
common myeloid progenitor2.67e-21112
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.52e-1552
lymphocyte5.92e-1553
common lymphoid progenitor5.92e-1553
mature alpha-beta T cell1.46e-0918
alpha-beta T cell1.46e-0918
immature T cell1.46e-0918
mature T cell1.46e-0918
immature alpha-beta T cell1.46e-0918
mesenchymal cell6.15e-09358
connective tissue cell5.40e-08365
T cell1.06e-0725
pro-T cell1.06e-0725
lymphocyte of B lineage3.06e-0724
pro-B cell3.06e-0724
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system3.72e-31102
blood island3.72e-31102
hemolymphoid system9.77e-27112
bone marrow7.71e-2480
bone element8.30e-2286
skeletal element5.89e-16101
skeletal system5.89e-16101
immune system1.64e-15115
blood1.20e-0715
haemolymphatic fluid1.20e-0715
organism substance1.20e-0715
connective tissue1.70e-07375


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.