Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4500

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:49, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4500_small_frontal_insula_Hep2_non_amygdala_paracentral



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr5:41870475..41870494,-p2@OXCT1
Hg19::chr5:41870495..41870512,-p4@OXCT1
Hg19::chr5:41870518..41870535,-p1@OXCT1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell8.30e-1552
lymphocyte1.92e-1453
common lymphoid progenitor1.92e-1453
T cell2.12e-0925
pro-T cell2.12e-0925
mature alpha-beta T cell8.72e-0718
alpha-beta T cell8.72e-0718
immature T cell8.72e-0718
mature T cell8.72e-0718
immature alpha-beta T cell8.72e-0718
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
cerebral hemisphere7.19e-1432
telencephalon5.28e-1334
regional part of forebrain7.46e-1341
forebrain7.46e-1341
future forebrain7.46e-1341
gray matter1.32e-1234
brain grey matter1.32e-1234
regional part of telencephalon2.16e-1233
anterior neural tube2.78e-1242
brain3.05e-1269
future brain3.05e-1269
central nervous system3.72e-1282
neural tube3.91e-1257
neural rod3.91e-1257
future spinal cord3.91e-1257
neural keel3.91e-1257
regional part of brain1.23e-1159
cerebral cortex1.40e-1125
pallium1.40e-1125
regional part of cerebral cortex2.21e-1122
regional part of nervous system3.74e-1194
nervous system3.74e-1194
neocortex1.54e-1020
anterior region of body3.58e-09129
craniocervical region3.58e-09129
head1.83e-08123
neural plate4.09e-0886
presumptive neural plate4.09e-0886
pre-chordal neural plate5.74e-0861
larynx1.65e-079
neurectoderm3.20e-0790
ectoderm-derived structure3.25e-07169
upper respiratory tract3.29e-0719


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.