Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4626


Revision as of 11:11, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

Full id: C4626_salivary_amniotic_choriocarcinoma_Keratinocyte_maxillary_cervical_esophagus

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr6:7541814..7541825,+ p7@DSP
Hg19::chr6:7541832..7541844,+ p3@DSP
Hg19::chr6:7541845..7541878,+ p2@DSP

Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial cell2.60e-35254
endodermal cell2.40e-1859
endo-epithelial cell3.60e-1643
epithelial cell of alimentary canal5.88e-0921
respiratory epithelial cell8.51e-0713
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
endoderm-derived structure1.07e-21169
presumptive endoderm1.07e-21169
digestive system4.01e-17155
digestive tract4.01e-17155
primitive gut4.01e-17155
subdivision of digestive tract9.13e-16129
endodermal part of digestive tract9.13e-16129
mixed endoderm/mesoderm-derived structure3.76e-15130
multi-cellular organism1.57e-14659
immaterial anatomical entity9.00e-14126
organ part8.97e-13219
organism subdivision3.43e-12365
multi-tissue structure5.15e-12347
respiratory system6.18e-1272
anatomical space9.04e-12104
anatomical system6.00e-11625
subdivision of trunk9.79e-11113
anatomical group1.02e-10626
entire embryonic mesenchyme5.35e-10238
respiratory tract6.73e-0953
trunk region element2.38e-08107
anatomical cavity6.27e-0870
organ component layer2.70e-0757
extraembryonic membrane4.89e-0714
membranous layer4.89e-0714
respiratory primordium6.63e-0738
endoderm of foregut6.63e-0738
Ontology termp-valuen
cell type cancer3.13e-14143

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs

Jaspar motifs

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.

link to data source

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.