Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4745

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:56, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4745_CD19_CD14_stomach_immature_epididymis_spinal_smallcell



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr8:24151557..24151590,+p1@ADAM28
Hg19::chr8:24151592..24151611,+p2@ADAM28
Hg19::chr8:24162989..24162994,+p@chr8:24162989..24162994
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
defensive cell1.48e-2348
phagocyte1.48e-2348
hematopoietic stem cell1.31e-22168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.31e-22168
leukocyte1.62e-22136
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.70e-2261
myeloid cell2.05e-21108
common myeloid progenitor2.05e-21108
monopoietic cell4.87e-2159
monocyte4.87e-2159
monoblast4.87e-2159
promonocyte4.87e-2159
myeloid leukocyte1.39e-2072
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell2.18e-20161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell2.18e-20161
classical monocyte3.80e-2042
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte3.80e-2042
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell8.63e-2067
hematopoietic cell1.77e-19177
nongranular leukocyte8.84e-19115
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.78e-1766
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell8.29e-16120
B cell5.33e-1114
stuff accumulating cell4.91e-0887
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism8.23e-43114
hematopoietic system1.20e-1998
blood island1.20e-1998
neural tube1.31e-1856
neural rod1.31e-1856
future spinal cord1.31e-1856
neural keel1.31e-1856
hemolymphoid system8.47e-18108
regional part of nervous system6.22e-1753
regional part of brain6.22e-1753
bone marrow6.18e-1676
regional part of forebrain1.07e-1541
forebrain1.07e-1541
anterior neural tube1.07e-1541
future forebrain1.07e-1541
immune system3.18e-1493
bone element2.84e-1382
neural plate1.43e-1282
presumptive neural plate1.43e-1282
central nervous system1.54e-1281
skeletal element5.50e-1290
brain grey matter7.83e-1234
gray matter7.83e-1234
telencephalon1.08e-1134
brain1.71e-1168
future brain1.71e-1168
neurectoderm4.17e-1186
regional part of telencephalon1.02e-1032
cerebral hemisphere1.83e-1032
pre-chordal neural plate2.70e-1061
nervous system4.31e-1089
skeletal system1.64e-09100
regional part of cerebral cortex3.75e-0922
neocortex5.62e-0820
cerebral cortex3.02e-0725
pallium3.02e-0725
ecto-epithelium3.74e-07104


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BATF#10538216.23853452820240.004917462407809970.023006533907148
BCL11A#53335218.91297006907140.003639406248379680.0183958933875968
FOXA2#3170216.42030916844350.004810682352105480.0226031516182987
IRF4#3662214.60967512449610.006056122473217890.0268598341676747
NANOG#79923219.49651898734180.003427255648501020.0174621500962922



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.