Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C570

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:26, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C570_oral_Prostate_Esophageal_Mammary_Corneal_Keratinocyte_Small



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr16:87865215..87865228,-p@chr16:87865215..87865228
-
Hg19::chr16:87865535..87865593,-p5@SLC7A5
Hg19::chr16:87865862..87865890,-p3@SLC7A5
Hg19::chr16:87865969..87865982,-p11@SLC7A5
Hg19::chr16:87866311..87866331,-p4@SLC7A5
Hg19::chr16:87868136..87868180,-p@chr16:87868136..87868180
-
Hg19::chr16:87870180..87870274,-p@chr16:87870180..87870274
-
Hg19::chr16:87871480..87871532,-p@chr16:87871480..87871532
-
Hg19::chr16:87872354..87872372,-p@chr16:87872354..87872372
-
Hg19::chr16:87872373..87872412,-p@chr16:87872373..87872412
-
Hg19::chr16:87873374..87873400,-p@chr16:87873374..87873400
-
Hg19::chr16:87873403..87873438,-p@chr16:87873403..87873438
-
Hg19::chr16:87874679..87874710,-p@chr16:87874679..87874710
-
Hg19::chr16:87874738..87874767,-p@chr16:87874738..87874767
-
Hg19::chr16:87885379..87885431,-p@chr16:87885379..87885431
-
Hg19::chr16:87903102..87903120,-p1@SLC7A5


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br><br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial cell2.14e-25253
animal cell1.61e-14679
eukaryotic cell1.61e-14679
endo-epithelial cell1.79e-1342
endodermal cell4.52e-1258
native cell3.25e-09722
ecto-epithelial cell1.24e-0734
respiratory epithelial cell2.44e-0713
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
cancer4.10e-16235
cell type cancer4.71e-16143
disease of cellular proliferation4.59e-15239
carcinoma9.36e-15106


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
POLR2A#5430162.147453176558074.88536678567824e-060.000151132352408012
SIN3A#25942113.718608249685411.49176951969046e-050.000353526019666331
SIX5#14791255.339598548580940.001736587159380960.0106881623159048
SP1#6667134.629934869739484.9106978951726e-083.16390115653258e-06
ZBTB33#100091121.7694984581121.16503414517696e-131.81604479236024e-11



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.