Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C694

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:24, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C694_immature_Natural_CD8_CD14_Eosinophils_Basophils_CD4



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr12:122229727..122229736,-p@chr12:122229727..122229736
-
Hg19::chr15:75747267..75747285,+p@chr15:75747267..75747285
+
Hg19::chr17:66233708..66233720,+p@chr17:66233708..66233720
+
Hg19::chr1:150601870..150601890,+p@chr1:150601870..150601890
+
Hg19::chr1:151966507..151966518,+p1@ENST00000432386
p1@uc001ezm.1
Hg19::chr1:19252656..19252668,-p@chr1:19252656..19252668
-
Hg19::chr1:19803947..19803962,-p@chr1:19803947..19803962
-
Hg19::chr1:19804053..19804060,+p@chr1:19804053..19804060
+
Hg19::chr1:221884484..221884492,-p@chr1:221884484..221884492
-
Hg19::chr2:70336251..70336262,+p@chr2:70336251..70336262
+
Hg19::chr4:103421745..103421751,+p@chr4:103421745..103421751
+
Hg19::chr7:23570867..23570875,+p@chr7:23570867..23570875
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte7.59e-41136
hematopoietic stem cell3.34e-33168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell3.34e-33168
hematopoietic cell4.69e-31177
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.39e-28120
intermediate monocyte1.08e-279
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte1.08e-279
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.79e-27161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.79e-27161
nongranular leukocyte4.72e-26115
myeloid leukocyte7.58e-2172
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell2.01e-1867
classical monocyte1.43e-1742
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.43e-1742
myeloid cell1.12e-16108
common myeloid progenitor1.12e-16108
defensive cell6.05e-1548
phagocyte6.05e-1548
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.20e-1466
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.80e-1461
natural killer cell6.71e-143
pro-NK cell6.71e-143
single nucleate cell4.69e-133
mononuclear cell4.69e-133
basophil5.08e-133
monopoietic cell2.78e-1159
monocyte2.78e-1159
monoblast2.78e-1159
promonocyte2.78e-1159
mesenchymal cell6.23e-11354
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.30e-1052
connective tissue cell1.53e-10361
lymphocyte2.33e-1053
common lymphoid progenitor2.33e-1053
nucleate cell7.05e-1055
CD1a-positive Langerhans cell9.30e-102
immature CD1a-positive Langerhans cell9.30e-102
motile cell3.62e-09386
granulocyte1.73e-088
Langerhans cell5.32e-085
mature alpha-beta T cell5.63e-0818
alpha-beta T cell5.63e-0818
immature T cell5.63e-0818
mature T cell5.63e-0818
immature alpha-beta T cell5.63e-0818
histamine secreting cell1.30e-075
biogenic amine secreting cell1.30e-075
granulocytopoietic cell1.30e-075
mast cell1.30e-075
mast cell progenitor1.30e-075
basophil mast progenitor cell1.30e-075
stem cell1.32e-07441
multi fate stem cell1.71e-07427
somatic stem cell2.91e-07433
CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell7.27e-076
stuff accumulating cell8.61e-0787
circulating cell9.97e-076
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
bone marrow1.72e-1776
hematopoietic system3.26e-1798
blood island3.26e-1798
bone element7.32e-1682
hemolymphoid system4.19e-15108
skeletal element5.00e-1490
immune system2.02e-1393
skeletal system3.76e-12100
connective tissue5.22e-10371


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
EBF1#187953.711027852737090.007149884520589760.0297263849301701



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.