Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C815

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 12:06, 5 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C815_Basophils_Eosinophils_CD14_Mast_Peripheral_CD34_CD14CD16



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr12:13253999..13254015,-p@chr12:13253999..13254015
-
Hg19::chr14:75725551..75725560,-p@chr14:75725551..75725560
-
Hg19::chr14:75725567..75725572,-p@chr14:75725567..75725572
-
Hg19::chr14:75725579..75725612,-p@chr14:75725579..75725612
-
Hg19::chr14:75725628..75725642,-p@chr14:75725628..75725642
-
Hg19::chr14:75743949..75743996,+p@chr14:75743949..75743996
+
Hg19::chr19:6057282..6057313,-p@chr19:6057282..6057313
-
Hg19::chr2:196933270..196933275,+p@chr2:196933270..196933275
+
Hg19::chr6:159463538..159463554,+p@chr6:159463538..159463554
+
Hg19::chr9:36152083..36152105,+p@chr9:36152083..36152105
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte2.56e-2642
classical monocyte9.60e-2445
leukocyte3.12e-23140
myeloid leukocyte1.17e-1976
hematopoietic stem cell5.38e-18172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell5.38e-18172
nongranular leukocyte1.42e-17119
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell7.70e-17124
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.36e-1671
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor7.57e-1665
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.19e-15165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.19e-15165
monopoietic cell6.07e-1563
monocyte6.07e-1563
monoblast6.07e-1563
promonocyte6.07e-1563
hematopoietic cell7.08e-15182
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.63e-1470
myeloid cell8.50e-13112
common myeloid progenitor8.50e-13112
intermediate monocyte2.81e-079
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte2.81e-079
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system1.35e-18102
blood island1.35e-18102
bone element9.78e-1686
bone marrow1.31e-1580
hemolymphoid system1.63e-14112
skeletal element4.18e-11101
skeletal system4.18e-11101
immune system3.17e-09115


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
ATF3#46748.98526981040350.0006636746018777640.00542656476516964
BHLHE40#8553417.9487254187914.64476779317696e-050.00081501159870902
BRCA1#67248.07369225728950.0009931821541010780.00712802027158896
CCNT2#90553.168100788481320.01227157669794290.0444825488947821
CEBPB#105175.579803338077374.14051761029175e-050.00075166264331872
E2F1#186962.944433528927590.007015119886153280.0296344337576331
E2F4#187456.334030157642220.0005501567218568720.00469887290431877
E2F6#187673.512009012188170.0008453950419482970.00637304841822132
EGR1#195862.992907456886080.006446587185075730.028012278719456
ELF1#199783.406478367046030.0002607995998237460.00279532526744583
EP300#203374.741759208356240.0001211445349442930.00164165227521046
ESR1#2099412.30744131846180.0001999674803985190.00240023028219066
FOXA1#316955.540709874692730.001021651775689810.00724619964694523
FOXA2#3170512.31523187633262.33853114552725e-050.000510095769230829
GTF2F1#296245.095864350703060.00541638888230090.0245671084199871
HMGN3#932454.08927386167530.004038023271587280.0193346374684258
JUN#372578.758980434635432.00832209907879e-067.34408794487709e-05
JUNB#3726412.24425306392850.0002039607414596510.00242089508777185
JUND#372764.196798365122620.001065203456546050.00752443583349431
MAFF#23764422.52614259597811.91315680697685e-050.000433235437475834
MAFK#7975513.5503665689151.4731115171922e-050.000349580308439074
MAX#414995.807299958106414.43335817213899e-072.11326104125981e-05
MXI1#460176.973100140131519.35179885105888e-060.000248965720164603
MYC#460963.133369122965640.005077423268455520.0236300079646284
NFYA#480047.370232279932210.001397112769899070.0090900237089141
PAX5#507974.668695871824480.0001341235735206540.0017593232724094
PBX3#509048.765805074697650.000728667835365060.00581014964557119
POLR2A#543091.932707858902260.005980089183606110.0268118199642242
POU2F2#545265.463674434645510.0002482209573289410.00267809385976005
RFX5#599356.023955413597550.0006945114068748440.00559719706941908
SIN3A#2594273.786219308770590.0005225362319000430.00452663914427742
SMARCB1#659847.301086312462970.001447103644365430.0092777199210486
SPI1#668864.922594105113640.0004434197902305250.00412895145077441
SREBF1#6720628.2035096642931.80211605019971e-081.2989040591222e-06
STAT3#677477.363625498007976.48369150656884e-060.000191123414409975
TAF1#687272.34013240002170.01040839844348330.0386380438273601
TAF7#687944.573227761969570.007980040641138020.0322621245894714
TCF12#693866.380678941311850.0001037697574830750.00145081789849731
TFAP2A#702046.607453749217980.002096541917954080.0121247434170888
TFAP2C#702277.566460026902165.39952747293911e-060.000164841055172841
THAP1#55145412.54765784114050.0001856500560886790.00224723066850319
USF1#739163.816899566324770.001780928663791640.0109282261291267
USF2#739245.196878954027840.005046003840154460.023505780332823



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.