Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C867


Revision as of 05:58, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

Full id: C867_CD4_CD8_Natural_CD19_Peripheral_cerebellum_Mast

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr10:114206689..114206719,- p2@ZDHHC6
Hg19::chr12:133562945..133562958,+ p2@ZNF26
Hg19::chr16:20753114..20753157,- p1@THUMPD1
Hg19::chr19:12273866..12273935,+ p1@ZNF136
Hg19::chr19:19843900..19843928,- p1@ZNF14
Hg19::chr1:114354876..114354922,- p1@RSBN1
Hg19::chr3:3221368..3221391,- p1@CRBN
Hg19::chr4:68411182..68411240,- p1@CENPC1
Hg19::chr5:78531917..78531974,+ p1@JMY

Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism1.13e-34115
neural tube1.94e-1657
neural rod1.94e-1657
future spinal cord1.94e-1657
neural keel1.94e-1657
anterior neural tube4.67e-1542
regional part of forebrain7.85e-1541
future forebrain7.85e-1541
central nervous system4.58e-1482
regional part of nervous system2.55e-1394
nervous system2.55e-1394
regional part of brain1.08e-1259
future brain1.94e-1269
gray matter7.91e-1234
brain grey matter7.91e-1234
regional part of telencephalon2.04e-1133
cerebral hemisphere4.38e-1132
regional part of cerebral cortex3.05e-0922
hematopoietic system7.19e-09102
blood island7.19e-09102
neural plate1.37e-0886
presumptive neural plate1.37e-0886
cerebral cortex1.96e-0825
hemolymphoid system3.38e-07112
pre-chordal neural plate7.12e-0761

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs

Jaspar motifs

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.

link to data source

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.