Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1074


Revision as of 10:21, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Mm9::chr11:48759650..48759652,- p8@Psme2
Mm9::chr11:83391998..83392010,- p1@Ccl9
Mm9::chr12:112680864..112680880,+ p1@Tnfaip2
Mm9::chr19:11124903..11124923,- p1@AW112010
Mm9::chr19:11124926..11124931,- p2@AW112010
Mm9::chr2:26883436..26883515,- p1@Slc2a6
Mm9::chr3:127483168..127483206,- p2@Alpk1

Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset

GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0008538proteasome activator activity0.0377937211406515
GO:0008537proteasome activator complex0.0377937211406515

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
digestive system1.21e-10116
digestive tract1.21e-10116
primitive gut1.21e-10116
endoderm-derived structure2.06e-10118
presumptive endoderm2.06e-10118
subdivision of digestive tract9.97e-10114
gastrointestinal system1.55e-0847
organ component layer1.69e-0824
musculoskeletal system6.89e-0832
intestinal mucosa2.93e-0713
anatomical wall2.93e-0713
wall of intestine2.93e-0713
gastrointestinal system mucosa2.93e-0713
bone marrow5.62e-0716

TFBS overrepresentationSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs

Jaspar motifs

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs