Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1025: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{Coexpression_clusters |full_id=C1025_Mast_lung_pineal_pituitary_cerebellum_Neutrophils_CD14 |id=C1025 }}")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{{Coexpression_clusters
|full_id=C1025_Mast_lung_pineal_pituitary_cerebellum_Neutrophils_CD14
|full_id=C1025_Mast_lung_pineal_pituitary_cerebellum_Neutrophils_CD14
|gostat_on_coexpression_clusters=GO:0006396!RNA processing!0.00680576209767547!10521;10181;55599$GO:0003723!RNA binding!0.0213310656543628!10521;10181;55599$GO:0005634!nucleus!0.0294399056100721!10521;10181;57396;55599;905$GO:0000074!regulation of progression through cell cycle!0.031184768323312!10181;905$GO:0051726!regulation of cell cycle!0.031184768323312!10181;905$GO:0016070!RNA metabolic process!0.0404000397154515!10521;10181;55599;905$GO:0000166!nucleotide binding!0.0404000397154515!10521;10181;57396;55599$GO:0043283!biopolymer metabolic process!0.0404000397154515!10521;10181;57396;55599;905$GO:0008186!RNA-dependent ATPase activity!0.0410818184990109!10521$GO:0022402!cell cycle process!0.0410818184990109!10181;905$GO:0003724!RNA helicase activity!0.0410818184990109!10521$GO:0043231!intracellular membrane-bound organelle!0.0410818184990109!10521;10181;57396;55599;905$GO:0043227!membrane-bound organelle!0.0410818184990109!10521;10181;57396;55599;905
|id=C1025
|id=C1025
}}
}}

Revision as of 17:33, 18 May 2012


Full id: C1025_Mast_lung_pineal_pituitary_cerebellum_Neutrophils_CD14



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr13:33112899..33112948,-p1@N4BP2L2
Hg19::chr1:104068562..104068632,+p2@RNPC3
Hg19::chr22:38902300..38902322,-p1@DDX17
Hg19::chr22:38902325..38902347,-p2@DDX17
Hg19::chr2:135676381..135676435,+p1@CCNT2
Hg19::chr3:50126345..50126401,+p1@RBM5
Hg19::chr5:178054014..178054096,-p1@CLK4
Hg19::chr6:170615819..170615877,+p1@FAM120B


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0006396RNA processing0.00680576209767547
GO:0003723RNA binding0.0213310656543628
GO:0005634nucleus0.0294399056100721
GO:0000074regulation of progression through cell cycle0.031184768323312
GO:0051726regulation of cell cycle0.031184768323312
GO:0016070RNA metabolic process0.0404000397154515
GO:0000166nucleotide binding0.0404000397154515
GO:0043283biopolymer metabolic process0.0404000397154515
GO:0008186RNA-dependent ATPase activity0.0410818184990109
GO:0022402cell cycle process0.0410818184990109
GO:0003724RNA helicase activity0.0410818184990109
GO:0043231intracellular membrane-bound organelle0.0410818184990109
GO:0043227membrane-bound organelle0.0410818184990109



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen

Disease
Ontology termp-valuen


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.