Coexpression cluster:C468

Full id: C468_Neutrophils_Eosinophils_cerebellum_occipital_Whole_temporal_parietal

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:74459876..74459930,+	p1@RNF169
Hg19::chr12:76953574..76953598,-	p3@OSBPL8
Hg19::chr14:52327421..52327458,+	p3@GNG2
Hg19::chr17:11924129..11924200,+	p1@MAP2K4
Hg19::chr17:47439568..47439641,-	p2@ZNF652
Hg19::chr1:89149914..89149995,+	p1@PKN2
Hg19::chr20:60813535..60813592,+	p2@OSBPL2
Hg19::chr2:139259324..139259389,+	p1@SPOPL
Hg19::chr2:160472952..160473077,-	p1@BAZ2B
Hg19::chr2:201936328..201936416,-	p1@FAM126B
Hg19::chr2:24714108..24714152,+	p@chr2:24714108..24714152 +
Hg19::chr2:86850949..86851023,-	p1@RNF103
Hg19::chr3:184529948..184529990,+	p1@VPS8
Hg19::chr4:6784401..6784510,+	p1@KIAA0232
Hg19::chr4:89513578..89513670,+	p1@HERC3
Hg19::chr5:112043186..112043225,+	p2@APC
Hg19::chr6:137113489..137113569,-	p1@MAP3K5
Hg19::chr6:42531690..42531718,+	p2@UBR2
Hg19::chr7:30634347..30634400,-	p1@uc003tbj.2 p1@uc003tbl.3 p1@uc010kvv.2
Hg19::chr8:52811714..52811731,-	p3@PCMTD1
Hg19::chrX:80065146..80065250,-	p1@BRWD3

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

GO ID	GO name	FDR corrected p-value
GO:0006464	protein modification process	0.0195237347183443
GO:0043412	biopolymer modification	0.0195237347183443
GO:0051983	regulation of chromosome segregation	0.0195237347183443
GO:0051988	regulation of attachment of spindle microtubules to kinetochore	0.0195237347183443
GO:0008608	attachment of spindle microtubules to kinetochore	0.0195237347183443
GO:0007254	JNK cascade	0.0195237347183443
GO:0031098	stress-activated protein kinase signaling pathway	0.0195237347183443
GO:0043687	post-translational protein modification	0.0216695468435289

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>

---

Cell Type

Ontology term	p-value	n

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n

Disease

Ontology term	p-value	n

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}

ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

---

No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

---

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.