Personal tools

Template:Novel motif: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 133: Line 133:
<br><br>
<br><br>
link to source dataset <br>
link to source dataset <br>
[http://fantom.gsc.riken.jp/5/datafiles/phase1.1/extra/Motifs/novel_Significance_of_the_correlation_with_CAGE_expression/hg19.pvalues.txt data]
[//fantom.gsc.riken.jp/5/datafiles/phase1.1/extra/Motifs/novel_Significance_of_the_correlation_with_CAGE_expression/hg19.pvalues.txt data]
}}
}}
----
----
Line 142: Line 142:
<br><br>
<br><br>
link to source dataset <br>
link to source dataset <br>
[http://fantom.gsc.riken.jp/5/datafiles/phase1.1/extra/Motifs/novel_Significance_of_the_correlation_with_CAGE_expression/mm9.pvalues.txt data]
[//fantom.gsc.riken.jp/5/datafiles/phase1.1/extra/Motifs/novel_Significance_of_the_correlation_with_CAGE_expression/mm9.pvalues.txt data]
}}
}}
----
----
Line 154: Line 154:
<br><br>
<br><br>
link to source dataset <br>
link to source dataset <br>
[http://fantom.gsc.riken.jp/5/datafiles/phase1.1/extra/Motifs/novel_GREAT_analysis_results/hg19.table.txt data]
[//fantom.gsc.riken.jp/5/datafiles/phase1.1/extra/Motifs/novel_GREAT_analysis_results/hg19.table.txt data]
}}
}}
----
----
Line 176: Line 176:
{{Fontsize|3|GREAT analysis results for mouse}}{{#info:Genomic Enrichment of Annotations Tool (GREAT, Nat Biotechnol. 2010 May;28(5):495-501) is used to identify, both in human and in mouse, the gene ontology terms of biological processes enriched given the predicted TFBSs, and evaluated the overlap in the top-500 gene ontology terms between human and mouse. For each novel motif, the P value for the overlap was then evaluated by calculating its relative rank with respect to this background distribution.<br>Analyst: Michiel de Hoon <br><br>
{{Fontsize|3|GREAT analysis results for mouse}}{{#info:Genomic Enrichment of Annotations Tool (GREAT, Nat Biotechnol. 2010 May;28(5):495-501) is used to identify, both in human and in mouse, the gene ontology terms of biological processes enriched given the predicted TFBSs, and evaluated the overlap in the top-500 gene ontology terms between human and mouse. For each novel motif, the P value for the overlap was then evaluated by calculating its relative rank with respect to this background distribution.<br>Analyst: Michiel de Hoon <br><br>
link to source dataset <br>
link to source dataset <br>
[http://fantom.gsc.riken.jp/5/datafiles/phase1.1/extra/Motifs/novel_GREAT_analysis_results/mm9.table.txt data]
[//fantom.gsc.riken.jp/5/datafiles/phase1.1/extra/Motifs/novel_GREAT_analysis_results/mm9.table.txt data]
}}
}}
----
----

Revision as of 16:23, 16 January 2020

name:{{{name}}}

Association to promoter expression in human samples<b>Summary:</b>Significance of the correlation with CAGE expression, human <br><b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon<br><br>link to source dataset <br>data




Association to promoter expression in mouse samples <b>Summary:</b>Significance of the correlation with CAGE expression, mouse <br><b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon<br><br>link to source dataset <br>data




GREAT analysis results for human <b>Summary:</b>Genomic Enrichment of Annotations Tool (GREAT, Nat Biotechnol. 2010 May;28(5):495-501) is used to identify, both in human and in mouse, the gene ontology terms of biological processes enriched given the predicted TFBSs, and evaluated the overlap in the top-500 gene ontology terms between human and mouse. For each novel motif, the P value for the overlap was then evaluated by calculating its relative rank with respect to this background distribution.<br>Analyst: Michiel de Hoon<br><br>link to source dataset <br>data


GO IDGO Termp-value
{{{great_results_human}}}


GREAT analysis results for mouseGenomic Enrichment of Annotations Tool (GREAT, Nat Biotechnol. 2010 May;28(5):495-501) is used to identify, both in human and in mouse, the gene ontology terms of biological processes enriched given the predicted TFBSs, and evaluated the overlap in the top-500 gene ontology terms between human and mouse. For each novel motif, the P value for the overlap was then evaluated by calculating its relative rank with respect to this background distribution.<br>Analyst: Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source dataset <br>data

GO IDGO Termp-value
{{{great_results_mouse}}}