Personal tools

Template:Novel motif: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 99: Line 99:
scrollY: "300px",
scrollY: "300px",
scrollCollapse: true,
scrollCollapse: true,
     pLength: 10,
     pageLength: 10,
     lengthMenu: [[5,10,-1], [5,10,"All"]],
     lengthMenu: [[5,10,-1], [5,10,"All"]],
order: [[ 2, "asc" ]],
order: [[ 2, "asc" ]],
Line 123: Line 123:
scrollY: "300px",
scrollY: "300px",
scrollCollapse: true,
scrollCollapse: true,
     pLength: 10,
     pageLength: 10,
     lengthMenu: [[5,10,-1], [5,10,"All"]],
     lengthMenu: [[5,10,-1], [5,10,"All"]],
order: [[ 2, "asc" ]],
order: [[ 2, "asc" ]],

Revision as of 14:33, 17 January 2020

name:{{{name}}}

Association to promoter expression in human samples<b>Summary:</b>Significance of the correlation with CAGE expression, human <br><b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon<br><br>link to source dataset <br>data




Association to promoter expression in mouse samples <b>Summary:</b>Significance of the correlation with CAGE expression, mouse <br><b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon<br><br>link to source dataset <br>data




GREAT analysis results for human <b>Summary:</b>Genomic Enrichment of Annotations Tool (GREAT, Nat Biotechnol. 2010 May;28(5):495-501) is used to identify, both in human and in mouse, the gene ontology terms of biological processes enriched given the predicted TFBSs, and evaluated the overlap in the top-500 gene ontology terms between human and mouse. For each novel motif, the P value for the overlap was then evaluated by calculating its relative rank with respect to this background distribution.<br>Analyst: Michiel de Hoon<br><br>link to source dataset <br>data




GREAT analysis results for mouseGenomic Enrichment of Annotations Tool (GREAT, Nat Biotechnol. 2010 May;28(5):495-501) is used to identify, both in human and in mouse, the gene ontology terms of biological processes enriched given the predicted TFBSs, and evaluated the overlap in the top-500 gene ontology terms between human and mouse. For each novel motif, the P value for the overlap was then evaluated by calculating its relative rank with respect to this background distribution.<br>Analyst: Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source dataset <br>data