Personal tools

User:Hisa/SemanticSbox: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
</style>
</style>
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="/resource_browser/rb_js/datatables/media/js/jquery.dataTables.min.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="/resource_browser/rb_js/datatables/media/js/jquery.dataTables.min.js"></script>
</script>
</html>
<html>
<script type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function() {
    $('#tf_chipseq_enrich').dataTable({
"sScrollY": "300px",
"bPaginate": false,
"bScrollCollapse": true,
"iDisplayLength": -1,
"aaSorting": [[2,'desc']],
"aoColumnDefs": [{ "sWidth": "200px", "sType": "numeric", "aTargets": [3] },{ "sWidth": "200px", "sType": "numeric", "aTargets": [4] }]
});
});
</script>
</script>
</html>
</html>

Revision as of 13:32, 4 September 2012


ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis

Method: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br>Analyst: Erick Arner

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
IRF4410.957256340.0002614920.002802174
MXI144.9807858140.0050944150.023698528
NFKB185.4880634241.21E-064.91E-05