Template:Coexpression clusters: Difference between revisions
From FANTOM5_SSTAR
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 191: | Line 191: | ||
== Coexpression_DPI_cluster_scores_median == | == Coexpression_DPI_cluster_scores_median == | ||
{{#info: <br>Analyst: }} | {{#info: <br>Analyst: }} | ||
{{#if: {{#pos:{{{coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median}}}|,}} | | {{#if: {{#pos:{{{coexpression_dpi_cluster_scores_median}}}|,}} | | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
Revision as of 13:08, 12 September 2012
Full id: {{{full_id}}}
Phase1 CAGE Peaks
Pathway enrichment analysis
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont
GOStat results on Coexpression cluster
The results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters("All" category). <br>Analyst: Erik Arner
Sample enrichment analysis
The results for enrichment analysis on "All" data of MCL co-expression cluster. That are sorted by ontologies each samples belonging. Original Data <br>Analyst: Hideya Kawaji
TFBS overrepresentation
The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <br>Analyst: Michiel de Hoon
ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis
Method: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br>Analyst: Erick Arner
No analysis results for this cluster
Coexpression_DPI_cluster_scores_median
<br>Analyst:
No analysis results for this cluster
