Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4177

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 21:53, 22 January 2013 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4177_lung_bile_mesenchymal_somatostatinoma_testicular_hepatoma_large



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:209118929..209118940,-p8@IDH1
Hg19::chr2:209118956..209118973,-p2@IDH1
Hg19::chr2:209118974..209118991,-p7@IDH1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
fat cell1.61e-0815
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
body cavity8.69e-0746
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
disease of cellular proliferation3.17e-28239
cancer1.42e-26235
cell type cancer1.27e-20143
carcinoma8.15e-18106
organ system cancer1.44e-09137
myeloid leukemia1.77e-0731


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.178364
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.11.80735
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.10.658629
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.341392
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.10.557638
MA0056.10
MA0057.14.3182
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.10.456531
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.11.04561
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.11.79391
MA0074.12.15449
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.10.257905
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.13.60951
MA0101.11.55947
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.12.3269
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.11.36919
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.10.560723
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.12.4174
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.11.96087
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.10.273764
MA0146.10.107247
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.21.9924
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.24.04548
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.20.476938
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.20.491226
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.20.731309
MA0065.20.760954
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.312019
MA0155.12.83144
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.12.05956
MA0163.13.96434
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.27.52072
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.12.40872
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CCNT2#90536.336201576962630.003930750035764890.0190471675861945
CEBPB#105137.971147625824820.001974187055288560.0115462911948973
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.0280171545264744
CTCFL#140690319.74647435897440.0001298372005551160.00172060238405987
EGR1#195834.988179094810140.008056488137383440.032138251578633
ELF1#199734.258097958807540.01295179875054610.0463482237350791
EP300#203336.77394172622320.003216880500103790.0167799312031935
ESRRA#21013483.8403141361268.75956906834516e-096.72182684738354e-07
FOSL2#2355316.93020060456170.0002060162053171620.00243450175007005
GATA1#2623313.56030814380040.0004009615963782630.00388640632613916
GTF2F1#2962312.73966087675770.0004835525047438590.00434835027061683
HMGN3#932438.178547723350590.001827766942164210.0108905837330379
HNF4A#3172323.13229036295378.07584663437677e-050.00123003258954014
HNF4G#3174328.75342252644684.20470658818262e-050.000757913965072842
MYC#460935.22228187160940.007020843755740150.0295189171097321
NANOG#79923329.24477848101273.99627955670032e-050.000738834201844973
NR3C1#2908314.9730233311730.0002978331194675480.00309475606049859
PAX5#507936.669565531177830.003370290999677260.0173265971801769
POU2F2#545239.106124057742520.001324165192682130.00883557938656587
RAD21#5885310.35503389545630.0009004912073565420.00665720968394633
RXRA#6256320.07461713913330.0001235730348432220.00165438330803632
SIN3A#2594235.408884726815140.006318961977991520.0277463136438704
SMC3#9126315.04493284493280.0002935825420371870.00309774369648633
SP1#666735.69838137814090.005403962701712170.0247081893268592
SRF#6722313.79717826216780.0003806615025800190.00375729200150785
TCF12#6938310.63446490218640.0008313523990202070.00630221479286284
TCF7L2#6934310.77017656313730.0008003181298398380.00615179400620762
TFAP2A#7020316.5186343730450.0002218033880766340.00248737507219323
TFAP2C#7022310.80922860986020.0007916746575753130.00617073733580925
USF1#739136.361499277207960.00388404057290560.0190766230903728
YY1#752834.911170749853860.008441455341808260.0330119506643868
ZBTB7A#5134137.35190930787590.002516255860282270.014053221700108
ZNF143#7702313.50087655222790.0004062804962997170.00389780716085303



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.