Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:820

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:58, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr14:55086951..55086964,+p@chr14:55086951..55086964
+
Mm9::chr19:6051392..6051406,+p@chr19:6051392..6051406
+
Mm9::chr1:172771902..172771921,-p@chr1:172771902..172771921
-
Mm9::chr1:95321940..95321965,-p@chr1:95321940..95321965
-
Mm9::chr2:26296488..26296491,-p@chr2:26296488..26296491
-
Mm9::chr4:115550901..115550936,+p@chr4:115550901..115550936
+
Mm9::chr5:138038533..138038546,-p@chr5:138038533..138038546
-
Mm9::chr6:83005487..83005519,+p@chr6:83005487..83005519
+
Mm9::chr8:124121679..124121694,+p@chr8:124121679..124121694
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0006869lipid transport0.00247432988600952
GO:0005041low-density lipoprotein receptor activity0.0167579387420351
GO:0030169low-density lipoprotein binding0.0167579387420351
GO:0030228lipoprotein receptor activity0.0167579387420351
GO:0008034lipoprotein binding0.0217793521110023
GO:0006629lipid metabolic process0.02533347301713
GO:0005905coated pit0.037060117484394
GO:0005319lipid transporter activity0.0480788217914411



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
trunk2.65e-0990
immaterial anatomical entity9.59e-0979
trunk region element1.91e-0879
organism subdivision2.87e-08150
anatomical system1.49e-07308
anatomical group1.49e-07308
abdomen element3.92e-0749
abdominal segment element3.92e-0749
abdominal segment of trunk3.92e-0749
abdomen3.92e-0749
trunk mesenchyme5.56e-0745
multi-cellular organism9.10e-07333


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}